Meh, I'm fine with people talking in any venue they wish. Speaking only for myself, I don't need to read everything everyone has written; if it's something that needs to be brought to broader attention, chances are someone will facilitate it. But I think even those who are entirely happy to be on Facebook would agree there's a bit of an irony on talking about the respect for Wikimedia community values on a site that explicitly doesn't share them.
That, and it's a bit unfair to tease people.
Risker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 22:01, Gergő Tisza gtisza@gmail.com wrote:
One example of the shortcomings of emails as a medium for complex discussions is how this thread about postmortems continues to be diverted into discussions about Facebook, despite Pete's best efforts.
At the end of the day, people will prefer tools that work well over tools that align philosophically. One can sabotage the development of tools that would both work well and uphold Wikimedia's values, but cannot prevent important discussions from moving to other venues (which will necessarily be a worse match for those values). There is a lesson there, although I'm afraid it will take some more time before we learn it. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe