Everybody always tries to get rid of the content pixels because they beat up the other pixels, but I tell you what, if you don't give those content creator pixels what they want they're going to take their RGB and go home and THEN where will your silly little projects be without any content pixels, hmmmmmm?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Aleksey Bilogur aleksey.bilogur@gmail.com wrote:
I love today. On Apr 1, 2015 5:28 PM, "quiddity" pandiculation@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute
pixels,
encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels.
That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels out of the FOV aren't worth as much!
I assume you mean "assigning *mass*" to the pixels. Weight is so Earth-centric!
I would like to join the kawaii-pixel WikiProject. Please let me know when we start debating the relative merits of various color models, and naming conventions, and kawaii-challenged accessibility tools. Thanks!
-- quiddity
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe