Everybody always tries to get rid of the content pixels because they beat
up the other pixels, but I tell you what, if you don't give those content
creator pixels what they want they're going to take their RGB and go home
and THEN where will your silly little projects be without any content
pixels, hmmmmmm?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Aleksey Bilogur <aleksey.bilogur(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I love today.
On Apr 1, 2015 5:28 PM, "quiddity" <pandiculation(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Marc A. Pelletier
<marc(a)uberbox.org>
wrote:
> On 15-04-01 03:58 PM, Pierre-Selim wrote:
>> This is only the beginning: next step is the measurement of cute
pixels,
encyclopedic pixels and amazing pixels.
That metric is all wrong, because it presumes that all pixels are
equally valuable. Surely, you should be also assigning weights to
pixels depending on how much information they carry - background pixels
out of the FOV aren't worth as much!
I assume you mean "assigning *mass*" to the pixels. Weight is so
Earth-centric!
I would like to join the kawaii-pixel WikiProject. Please let me know
when we start debating the relative merits of various color models,
and naming conventions, and kawaii-challenged accessibility tools.
Thanks!
-- quiddity
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>