That is why there is a whole process now to correct the mistakes that arise from this "non-professional system", including a dedicated ombudsperson for the case(s).
It’s worth noting that the ombudsperson role has existed since the start of the FDC - the role is there to receive, investigate and document complaints about the FDC process, see: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Omb... https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Ombudsperson_role,_expectations,_and_selection_process for details. The appeals to the board process has also existed from the start. Neither are new processes that have been started since the creation of the FDC, as your comment implies.
Thanks, Mike