After reading the report I really hope that the FDC continues prospering and growing. There are very insightful recommendations to be found there and I hope they are put into practice.
I also think that this kind of report reinforces and shows in full splendor the spirit of community participation and co-governance that many of us we feel identified with.
Thanks for having shown how a good report should look like.
Micru
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak darekj@alk.edu.plwrote:
Dear Lodewijk,
thank you! I cannot promise this level of detail when we have many more participants in Round 1 next year (if the FDC process continues), but we'll do our best to aim for detailed feedback. Encouragement from the community means a lot to us, and I appreciate it.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak, "pundit"
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk@effeietsanders.org
wrote:
Thanks for the much more detailed reasoning and feedback! This actually gives a good insight why decisions were taken as they were and a major improvement compared to previous rounds.
Lodewijk
2014-05-25 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tonmoy Khan tonmoy.du@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
I thank you all for your encouraging comments on behalf of the FDC. We
will
be very happy to see our recommendations materialise for the benefit of
the
Wikimedia movement as a whole. We are grateful to everyone who has
been a
part of this process so far.
Regards
Ali Haidar Khan On May 24, 2014 9:06 PM, "Lila Tretikov" lila@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you FDC for completing this work and providing valuable
feedback.
As
we continue to improve our planning process and our funding programs
we
hope to make your work easier as well.
Thanks everyone else who has participated with comments and recommendations.
Lila
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Samuel Klein sj@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Dear Dariusz and FDC,
Thank you for this fine recommendation. I just read through it for the first time (of many, I expect), and the analyses are clearly getting crisper over time. There are many constructive details
packed
into each review, and the results are relevant both to the applying organizations, and to how we plan for the future.
I am glad to see the analysis of the excellent Wikimedia France proposal. And both the CIS and the Wikimedia Norge proposals seem
to
have been complicated in their own way, but were handled smoothly.
The analysis of WMF's own proposal is clear and rewardingly
thorough.
(Other organizations may be jealous and ask for a more detailed
report
next time) A few points I found particularly useful: the focus on areas where
we
need clearer goals + measures, the detailed feedback on technical changes, and the observation that legal work is a significant part
of
our budget and work, and central to our mission, but here was
lumped
in with administration. The last point is indicative of a larger blind spot, I think.
I also appreciate the emphasis on regular checks of our work
against
a
strategy, and the need to organize an effective transition to new strategic goals. The suggestions for a community-led strategy
advisory
group, and for a pool of global metrics for [cross-]evaluation, are well considered. Both could also make the FDC's work easier in the future...
Congratulations on this work. And good luck to those FDC advisors meeting over the coming days.
Sam.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <
darekj@alk.edu.pl
wrote:
Hello friends,
The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help
make
decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to
achieve
the
Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1]
On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 2
2013-2014
recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
have
now
been
posted on Meta [2]:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_roun...
The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations
by
1
July
For the second round of this fiscal year, the committee received
four
proposals. [3] These four proposals came from two chapters, WMF
and
one
non-Wikimedia organization, totaling requests of '''$1.56'''
million
USD.
Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in Frankfurt from
21st-24th
May,
the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance
and
history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff
presented
an
overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations.
The
FDC
and
FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the
proposal
form discussion pages during the four-week community review
period
(and
prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the
discussions
about the proposals.
The committee thanks all organizations that submitted proposals,
as
it
required significant effort to both create the proposal and to
respond
to
the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC
staff.
We
sincerely appreciate them all for this work.
For formal complaints or appeals about the recommendations, there
is
a
separate process that entities should follow. Note that at the
request
of
many stakeholders, we are clarifying the complaints and appeals
terminology
so that complaints are made about the process to the ombudsperson
and
appeals on the recommendations are made to the WMF Board
representatives.
These are further explained below:
Any organization that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s
Round 2
recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to
the
FDC
by
'''end of day UTC 8 June 2014''' in accordance with the appeal
process
outlined in the FDC Framework. The process is as follows:
Appeals to the WMF Board on the recommendations of the FDC
(formerly
called
complaints, terminology changed to avoid further confusion):
- A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be
in
the
form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two
non-voting
WMF
Board representatives to the FDC (Patricio Lorente and Bishakha
Datta).
- The appeal should be submitted on-wiki through the FDC portal
page
designated for this purpose. [4]
- Formal appeals can be submitted only by the Board Chair of a
funding-seeking organization.
- Formal appeals must be filed within seven days of the deadline
for
submission of the FDC slate of recommendations to the WMF Board,
even
if
the recommendations are published before the deadline for the recommendations i.e. end-of-day '''1 June 2014'''. The deadline
for
appeals
is the end-of-day UTC on '''8 June 2014'''.
- These board representatives will present the appeal to the WMF
Board
at
the same time as the Board considers the FDC recommendation.
Responses
to
an appeal will be made alongside the overall decision on the FDC recommendations, i.e. by end-of-day UTC '''1 July 2014'''.
- Any planned or approved disbursements to the organization
filing
an
appeal will be put on hold until the appeal is resolved.
- If the WMF Board's consideration of the appeal results in an
amendment
of
the FDC's recommendations (which is expected only in
extraordinary
circumstances), the WMF Board may choose to release extra funds
from
the
WMF reserves to provide additional funds not allocated by the
FDC's
initial
recommendation.
- The Ombudsperson, as well as members of the WMF Board other
than
the
Board representatives, may participate in the investigation if
approved
by
the Chair of the WMF Board.
Complaints to the ombudsperson about the FDC process (formerly
called
appeals):
- A complaint about the FDC process can be filed by anyone with
the
Ombudsperson and can be made any time during a particular round
of
the
FDC
process (e.g. in this instance, from start '''1 April 2014''').
- The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC
portal
page
designated for this purpose [5]
- The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the
complaint,
and
investigate the complaint, as needed.
On behalf of the FDC,
"pundit" Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair)
[1]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_t...
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_roun...
[3] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Proposals
[4]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_recomm...
[5]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Complaints_about_the_FDC_process
[[Category:2013-2014 Round 2]] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
-- Samuel Klein w:user:sj @metasj +1 617
529
4266
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak profesor zarządzania kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego i centrum badawczego CROW Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl
członek Akademii Młodych Uczonych Polskiej Akademii Nauk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe