After reading the report I really hope that the FDC continues prospering
and growing. There are very insightful recommendations to be found there
and I hope they are put into practice.
I also think that this kind of report reinforces and shows in full splendor
the spirit of community participation and co-governance that many of us we
feel identified with.
Thanks for having shown how a good report should look like.
Micru
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <darekj(a)alk.edu.pl>wrote;wrote:
Dear Lodewijk,
thank you! I cannot promise this level of detail when we have many more
participants in Round 1 next year (if the FDC process continues), but we'll
do our best to aim for detailed feedback. Encouragement from the community
means a lot to us, and I appreciate it.
best,
Dariusz Jemielniak, "pundit"
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Lodewijk <lodewijk(a)effeietsanders.org
wrote:
Thanks for the much more detailed reasoning and
feedback! This actually
gives a good insight why decisions were taken as they were and a major
improvement compared to previous rounds.
Lodewijk
2014-05-25 0:12 GMT+02:00 Tonmoy Khan <tonmoy.du(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello everyone,
I thank you all for your encouraging comments on behalf of the FDC. We
will
be very happy to see our recommendations
materialise for the benefit of
the
> Wikimedia movement as a whole. We are grateful to everyone who has
been a
> part of this process so far.
>
> Regards
>
> Ali Haidar Khan
> On May 24, 2014 9:06 PM, "Lila Tretikov" <lila(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> > Thank you FDC for completing this work and providing valuable
feedback.
> As
> > we continue to improve our planning process and our funding programs
we
> hope
to make your work easier as well.
>
> Thanks everyone else who has participated with comments and
> recommendations.
>
> Lila
>
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Samuel Klein <sj(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Dariusz and FDC,
> > >
> > > Thank you for this fine recommendation. I just read through it for
> > > the first time (of many, I expect), and the analyses are clearly
> > > getting crisper over time. There are many constructive details
packed
> >
into each review, and the results are relevant both to the applying
> > organizations, and to how we plan for the future.
> >
> >
> > I am glad to see the analysis of the excellent Wikimedia France
> > proposal. And both the CIS and the Wikimedia Norge proposals seem
to
> > > have been complicated in their own way, but were handled smoothly.
> > >
> > > The analysis of WMF's own proposal is clear and rewardingly
thorough.
> >
(Other organizations may be jealous and ask for a more detailed
report
> > > next time)
> > > A few points I found particularly useful: the focus on areas where
we
> > > need clearer goals + measures, the
detailed feedback on technical
> > > changes, and the observation that legal work is a significant part
of
> > > our budget and work, and central
to our mission, but here was
lumped
> > > in with administration. The last
point is indicative of a larger
> > > blind spot, I think.
> > >
> > > I also appreciate the emphasis on regular checks of our work
against
a
> > strategy, and the need to organize an
effective transition to new
> > strategic goals. The suggestions for a community-led strategy
advisory
> > group, and for a pool of global metrics
for [cross-]evaluation, are
> > well considered. Both could also make the FDC's work easier in the
> > future...
> >
> > Congratulations on this work. And good luck to those FDC advisors
> > meeting over the coming days.
> >
> > Sam.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak <
darekj(a)alk.edu.pl
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello friends,
> > > >
> > > > The Funds Dissemination Committee meets twice annually to help
make
> >
> decisions about how to effectively allocate movement funds to
achieve
> > the
> > > > Wikimedia movement's mission, vision, and strategy. [1]
> > > >
> > > > On behalf of the committee, I am pleased to announce that Round 2
> > > 2013-2014
> > > > recommendations to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees
have
now
> been
> > posted on Meta [2]:
> >
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_rou…
> > > >
> > > > The WMF Board will make their decision on these recommendations
by
1
> July
> > > 2014.
> > >
> > > For the second round of this fiscal year, the committee received
four
> > > proposals. [3] These four
proposals came from two chapters, WMF
and
> one
> > > non-Wikimedia organization, totaling requests of
'''$1.56'''
million
> USD.
> > > Prior to our face-to-face deliberations in Frankfurt from
21st-24th
> May,
> > > the FDC reviewed the proposals in careful detail, aided by staff
> > > assessments and analysis on programs, finances, grant compliance
and
> > > > history, as well as community comments on the proposals. Staff
> > presented
> > > an
> > > > overview of these findings to the FDC during the deliberations.
The
> FDC
> > > and
> > > > FDC staff also asked clarifying questions to the entities on the
> > proposal
> > > > form discussion pages during the four-week community review
period
> (and
> > > > prior to the publishing of staff assessments), and observed the
> > > discussions
> > > > about the proposals.
> > > >
> > > > The committee thanks all organizations that submitted proposals,
as
> it
> > > > required significant effort to both create the proposal and to
> respond
> > to
> > > > the questions and feedback from the community, FDC, and FDC
staff.
We
> > > sincerely appreciate them all for this work.
> > >
> > > For formal complaints or appeals about the recommendations, there
is
a
> > separate process that entities should
follow. Note that at the
request
> of
> > > many stakeholders, we are clarifying the complaints and appeals
> > terminology
> > > so that complaints are made about the process to the ombudsperson
and
> > > > appeals on the recommendations are made to the WMF Board
> > representatives.
> > > > These are further explained below:
> > > >
> > > > Any organization that would like to submit an appeal on the FDC’s
> > Round 2
> > > > recommendation should submit it to the Board representatives to
the
FDC
> by
> > '''end of day UTC 8 June 2014''' in accordance with the
appeal
process
> > > outlined in the FDC Framework. The process is as follows:
> > >
> > > Appeals to the WMF Board on the recommendations of the FDC
(formerly
> > called
> > > complaints, terminology changed to avoid further confusion):
> > >
> > > * A formal appeal to challenge the FDC’s recommendation should be
in
> > the
> > > > form of a 500-or-fewer word summary directed to the two
non-voting
WMF
> > Board representatives to the FDC
(Patricio Lorente and Bishakha
Datta).
> > >
> > > * The appeal should be submitted on-wiki through the FDC portal
page
> > > designated for this purpose. [4]
> > >
> > > * Formal appeals can be submitted only by the Board Chair of a
> > > funding-seeking organization.
> > >
> > > * Formal appeals must be filed within seven days of the deadline
for
> > > submission of the FDC slate of
recommendations to the WMF Board,
even
> > if
> > > > the recommendations are published before the deadline for the
> > > > recommendations i.e. end-of-day '''1 June
2014'''. The deadline
for
> > > appeals
> > > > is the end-of-day UTC on '''8 June 2014'''.
> > > >
> > > > * These board representatives will present the appeal to the WMF
> Board
> > at
> > > > the same time as the Board considers the FDC recommendation.
> Responses
> > to
> > > > an appeal will be made alongside the overall decision on the FDC
> > > > recommendations, i.e. by end-of-day UTC '''1 July
2014'''.
> > > >
> > > > * Any planned or approved disbursements to the organization
filing
an
> > > > appeal will be put on hold until the appeal is resolved.
> > > >
> > > > * If the WMF Board's consideration of the appeal results in an
> > amendment
> > > of
> > > > the FDC's recommendations (which is expected only in
extraordinary
> >
> circumstances), the WMF Board may choose to release extra funds
from
> > the
> > > > WMF reserves to provide additional funds not allocated by the
FDC's
> > > initial
> > > > recommendation.
> > > >
> > > > * The Ombudsperson, as well as members of the WMF Board other
than
the
> > Board representatives, may participate
in the investigation if
approved
> > by
> > > the Chair of the WMF Board.
> > >
> > > Complaints to the ombudsperson about the FDC process (formerly
called
> > > > appeals):
> > > >
> > > > * A complaint about the FDC process can be filed by anyone with
the
> > > > Ombudsperson and can be made
any time during a particular round
of
> the
> > > FDC
> > > > process (e.g. in this instance, from start '''1 April
2014''').
> > > >
> > > > * The complaint should be submitted on wiki, through the FDC
portal
>
page
> > > designated for this purpose [5]
> > >
> > > * The ombudsperson will receive and publicly document the
complaint,
and
> > investigate the complaint, as needed.
> >
> > On behalf of the FDC,
> >
> > "pundit" Dariusz Jemielniak (FDC Chair)
> >
> > [1]
> >
>
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Funds_Dissemination_Committee/Framework_for_…
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/FDC_recommendations/2013-2014_rou…
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Appeals_to_the_Board_on_the_recom…
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/FDC_portal/Complaints_about_the_FDC_process
> > > >
> > > > [[Category:2013-2014 Round 2]]
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Samuel Klein w:user:sj @metasj +1 617
529
>
4266
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__________________________
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
http://www.crow.alk.edu.pl
członek Akademii Młodych Uczonych Polskiej Akademii Nauk
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>