On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:27 AM, svetlana svetlana@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:53, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana svetlana@fastmail.com.au
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care
very
much about the site and they notice something is terrible going
wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against the other party
[...]
You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages?
Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]]
Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't think so, you get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it.
I have advocated using force? Where?! Please don't answer -- I am done with this thread, it has no basis in reality.
Because you went and did something contradicting user preferences; WMF did not. You'd think it's "better" because it's "unchanged compared to what it was X months ago", and that justifies your thing? No, it does not.
I don't even know what you're talking about here. But again -- let's let it go.
Pete