On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:27 AM, svetlana <svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:53, Pete Forsyth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana
<svetlana(a)fastmail.com.au>
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
> > That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care
very
> > much about the site and they notice
something is terrible going
wrong on
WMF side and too less is done to fix those
problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against
the other party
[...]
You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about
accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among
other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the
encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages?
Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't
think so, you get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it.
I have advocated using force? Where?! Please don't answer -- I am done with
this thread, it has no basis in reality.
Because you went and did something contradicting user
preferences; WMF did
not. You'd think it's "better" because it's "unchanged
compared to what it
was X months ago", and that justifies your thing? No, it does not.
I don't even know what you're talking about here. But again -- let's let it
go.
Pete