it is an interesting idea, but I definitely would narrow it down to F/L/OSS-related organizations, as we have a very specific set of values as a movement.
dj "pundit"
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Balázs Viczián < balazs.viczian@wikimedia.hu> wrote:
imo WMF is a mid-to-large sized IT company operating on a non-pofit basis.
Whoever has _both_ the skillset (and history) of reviewing IT companies and charities, both types above 100+ employees can be considered capable of reviewing WMF as a whole.
Cheers, Balazs 2014.04.25. 21:17, "Michael Peel" email@mikepeel.net ezt írta:
Hi Risker,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Instead I suggest that the FDC seek authorization from the Board for an independent third party review if it feels that there is not the
necessary
ability for the FDC to produce its own assessment.
I'm personally curious to know whether you have any suggestions of third parties that might be able to carry out this sort of review, considering the requisite knowledge of the Wikimedia movement? It might be an option worth thinking about in future years.
Thanks, Mike
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe