it is an interesting idea, but I definitely would narrow it down to
F/L/OSS-related organizations, as we have a very specific set of values as
a movement.
dj "pundit"
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Balázs Viczián <
balazs.viczian(a)wikimedia.hu> wrote:
imo WMF is a mid-to-large sized IT company operating
on a non-pofit basis.
Whoever has _both_ the skillset (and history) of reviewing IT companies and
charities, both types above 100+ employees can be considered capable of
reviewing WMF as a whole.
Cheers,
Balazs
2014.04.25. 21:17, "Michael Peel" <email(a)mikepeel.net> ezt írta:
Hi Risker,
Thanks for your thoughts.
Instead I suggest that the FDC seek authorization
from the Board for an
independent third party review if it feels that there is not the
necessary
ability for the FDC to produce its own
assessment.
I'm personally curious to know whether you have any suggestions of third
parties that might be able to carry out this sort of review, considering
the requisite knowledge of the Wikimedia movement? It might be an option
worth thinking about in future years.
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
__________________________
dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
profesor zarządzania
kierownik katedry Zarządzania Międzynarodowego
i centrum badawczego CROW
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego