On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 April 2014 22:05, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
You haven't mentioned it on this list, but you actually accused Zack of violating the sockpuppetry policy on his talk page, and you threaten to "pursue further action." But the most cursory review of the sockpuppetry policy, which I assume you performed before making an accusation, reveals that even if he had not disclosed the Wikitedium account he would hardly have violated any part of the rules. Perhaps your personal feelings have indeed influenced your behavior here. You may want to reconsider further involvement.
+1
I did acknowledge that I had missed that, in my response to Erik, in my
response to Zack and Risker, and also in the notes I've left on both user accounts' talk pages. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-April/071203.html(emai... to Zack/Risker not yet archived)
My understanding of the sock puppet policy is apparently not perfect. But I stand my my personal and professional understanding of what the best practices are for disclosure, for somebody in a leadership position in the Wikimedia movement.
Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]]