On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 April 2014 22:05, Nathan
<nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You haven't mentioned it on this list, but
you actually accused Zack of
violating the sockpuppetry policy on his talk page, and you threaten to
"pursue further action." But the most cursory review of the sockpuppetry
policy, which I assume you performed before making an accusation, reveals
that even if he had not disclosed the Wikitedium account he would hardly
have violated any part of the rules. Perhaps your personal feelings have
indeed influenced your behavior here. You may want to reconsider further
involvement.
+1
I did acknowledge that I had missed that, in my response to Erik, in my
response to
Zack and Risker, and also in the notes I've left on both user
accounts' talk pages.
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-April/071203.html(ema…
to Zack/Risker not yet archived)
My understanding of the sock puppet policy is apparently not perfect. But I
stand my my personal and professional understanding of what the best
practices are for disclosure, for somebody in a leadership position in the
Wikimedia movement.
Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]