On 17 April 2014 09:40, Erik Moeller erik@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Fæ faewik@gmail.com wrote:
This is not the first time that Erik has been sarcastic and rude in an apparent attempt to close down discussion in public responses to whistle-blowers.
Please. You are making a mockery of every whistleblower on the planet; it's disgraceful. Russavia's original post cites examples such as editing about a coffeeshop or a school. They're frivolous examples, pointless, trollish, part of a sequence of behavior to mix the occasional legitimate concern with wild insinuations and conjecture. You tend to join these types of threads with cheerful and seemingly limitless energy to attempt to whip up tiny shitstorms. This has turned far too many conversations into the Fae/Russavia traveling circus, with both of you demanding individual explanations from the Board for why someone pooped.
Erik, you are not helping anyone by writing derisory nonsense and continuing to attack long term Wikimedians in this thread. Nobody has made "wild insinuations", nobody has demanded explanations from the board for "why someone pooped".
I expect Foundation senior managers to behave in a civil and respectful way when writing on governance failures and representing the Foundation and our movement. Senior managers are paid to do precisely this. I am paid precisely nothing to read the nonsense you are now spouting.
If you cannot behave yourself, please leave responses to other managers in the Foundation or check with Sue before pressing "send".
Thanks, Fae