On 17 April 2014 09:40, Erik Moeller <erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Fæ
<faewik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This is not the first time that Erik has been
sarcastic and rude in an
apparent attempt to close down discussion in public responses to
whistle-blowers.
Please. You are making a mockery of every whistleblower on the planet;
it's disgraceful. Russavia's original post cites examples such as
editing about a coffeeshop or a school. They're frivolous examples,
pointless, trollish, part of a sequence of behavior to mix the
occasional legitimate concern with wild insinuations and conjecture.
You tend to join these types of threads with cheerful and seemingly
limitless energy to attempt to whip up tiny shitstorms. This has
turned far too many conversations into the Fae/Russavia traveling
circus, with both of you demanding individual explanations from the
Board for why someone pooped.
Erik, you are not helping anyone by writing derisory nonsense and
continuing to attack long term Wikimedians in this thread. Nobody has
made "wild insinuations", nobody has demanded explanations from the
board for "why someone pooped".
I expect Foundation senior managers to behave in a civil and
respectful way when writing on governance failures and representing
the Foundation and our movement. Senior managers are paid to do
precisely this. I am paid precisely nothing to read the nonsense you
are now spouting.
If you cannot behave yourself, please leave responses to other
managers in the Foundation or check with Sue before pressing "send".
Thanks,
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae