Not right now, as far as I know.
Of course, two of the main use of arbitrary access are the possibility of
retrieving
* author metadata
* book metadata
and use them where you need.
For example, Ricordisamoa is doing some experiment here:
Pay attention to the dates, and then go in Edit mode: you'll see that he
put a "Wikidata" element, and in that the value is the Wikidata item for
Alessandro Manzoni.
This retrieves the birth date and death date from the item.
We could rewrite all our Author modules in Lua for authors, and put all our
authors in Wikidata.
That is probably the first thing we should do.
Aubrey
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Mietchen <
daniel.mietchen(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I think citation templates would be a good use case
for arbitrary
access on Wikisource. Is anyone working on this?
d.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm wondering:
In Wikisource, we use 3 different namespaces for a book
+ Index: for the Index page |
+ Page: for all the pages. | together, they make the "proofreading"
version of the book.
+ ns:0 for the textual version.
As far as I know, there is no linking between all the pages that make a
book.
There is no "structure" that says "these are 320 Page pages linked to
Index:BOOK.djvu".
Is that maybe something useful, that we want to address via Wikidata?
Or was it the unused BookManager extension that Molly wrote two years
ago?
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2
Aubrey
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need arbitrary item
access,
> so we can assume that it is already
mainstream, although it would be
nice to
> bring it to all Wikisources
>
> Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current
> levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability
point of
> view, I don't think that it is a good
idea to use percentage numbers as
> badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go
for:
> - incomplete text
> - not proofread
> - proofread
> - validated
>
> Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a
book
> with some missing pages could have been
"validated" and be an
"incomplete
> text". That is probably fine.
>
> Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already?
>
> Thanks
> Micru
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON
> <vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>uk>:
>>>
>>> On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>
>>> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody
doing
>>> > anything with it that can be
replicated in all Wikisources?
>>>
>>> {{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have
>>> plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias.
>>>
>>> Happy to advise further if needed.
>>
>>
>> Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't
think
>> so… but not sure).
>> Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according
to
>> Wikidata maybe some are missing) and
works fine. It should
definitively be
>> use on all Wikisources.
>>
>> The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access
>> (again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I
can't
>> understand his coding)
>> (by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on
>>
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia
infobox
?)
Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l