It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need arbitrary item access, so we can assume that it is already mainstream, although it would be nice to bring it to all Wikisources Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability point of view, I don't think that it is a good idea to use percentage numbers as badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go for: - incomplete text - not proofread - proofread - validated Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a book with some missing pages could have been "validated" and be an "incomplete text". That is probably fine. Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already? Thanks Micru On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com > > > 2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>uk>: > >> On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>> >> > Arbitrary access has been enabled in all Wikisources, is anybody doing >> > anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources? >> >> {{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have >> plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias. >> >> Happy to advise further if needed. >> > > Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't think > so… but not sure). > Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according to > Wikidata maybe some are missing) and works fine. It should definitively be > use on all Wikisources. > > The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access > (again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I can't > understand his coding) > (by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia infobox ?) > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > -- Etiamsi omnes, ego non

I think citation templates would be a good use case for arbitrary access on Wikisource. Is anyone working on this? d. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com> wrote:

On fr.ws whe have http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Pages_%C2%AB_Auteur_%C2%BB_san… ; same cat on en.ws http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Author_pages_not_connected_to_Wikida… It is very useful to fill Wikidata ! Cdlt, ~nicolas

2015-06-02 14:03 GMT+02:00 David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>om>: Nope, the category is automaticaly add through the Author template (with a small piece of code who looks like this : #if:{{#invoke:wikibase}} ). It's quite easy to add it in all wikisources with a Author template. Cdlt, ~nicolas

Not certain about these as badges and would rather hasten slowly see what they look like, get feedback prior to launching further. I was more trying to identify some of the arbitrary components that you want to be able to pull. In the end to identify when an Index: flicks to validated, that the system could be able to then identify that a work has now should be 'promoted' to complete for the main ns would be magic, and ultimately have the tweet go out through twitter of that news. From there that people can wander through related works in a list, etc. is value. I need better thinking time, and inspiration time. Definitely that we may poke at the WMAU crowd if their conference gets off the ground in October. Regards, Billinghurst On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:16 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com> wrote: