*There* is a wish for an possible enhancement. It would be nice to have
another state,m let's call it partly proofread once. In the german language
WS there a lot of magazines. The typically end in the middle of the page, or
there are several articles on one page. It would be nice to flag if there
are proofreaded parts on this page.
*The* following bug shall be added to this list here, Wikisource: IPs unable
to flag articles as "proofread"
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
There have been still long discussions with no solution
Especially teh comment from
--- Comment #28 from John Mark Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> 2009-11-19
15:31:21 UTC ---
Please provide unified diffs using "diff -ur old/ new/"
More fundamentally, I think it is necessary for the Proofread Page extension
to
not include access control. It should probably use the userCan hook, and let
another extension implement access control.
Also should be added, even admins aren't able to set pages to proofread
twice. In the de:ws we are converting, already proofread twice projects to
this extension, because the method with the two additional namespaces is
handsome. But it is an awfull work to go through the already done steps
again.
*There* is a bug, with zooming of the scans in PR2, the scrollbar vanishes,
and the picture itself is growing ore reducing itself - uninterruptable-
greetings
2010/6/29 Billinghurst <billinghurst(a)gmail.com>
This email highlighted and remind me of a couple of
issues,
1. The indexing functionality and how it fails for transcluded pages; which
is integral to
ProofreadPage when it transcludes working pages into the main namespace for
display.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18861
(thanks to MZMcBride for helping me track this down)
2. The support around djvu files in general, which is improved, though
still lacking in
the <gallery> extension, see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8480
Both of which have an impact for WS, though not exclusive to the site.
Regards, sDrewth
On 28 Jun 2010 at 23:22, Lars Aronsson wrote:
There is a lot of potential in Wikisource, but it
depends
heavily on the ProofreadPage extension and it has several
bugs that are reported but don't get fixed.
ThomasV is the main developer and perhaps he is the only
maintainer? It would be in the interest of the Wikimedia
Foundation to assign a salaried developer or two into
developing a more robust framework for Wikisource, either
by improving the existing extension or by integrating
some or all of its functionality into MediaWiki proper.
People everywhere have a need to make some PDF (or Djvu)
document available on a website, page by page, with the
ability to add categories and talk pages. This ability
is what the ProofreadPage extension adds to MediaWiki.
In my mind, it is as essential as the support for uploading
JPEG images and automatically generating thumbnails.
Adding multipage documents to a wiki should be a far more
common need than adding mathematical equations.
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik -
http://aronsson.se
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l