Hello Wikimedians,
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
I believe the most precious commodity in life is time. I seek challenges worthy of it. I do not work for a job, I work for impact and I chose this role above all others because I believe this is a critical moment for the future of our movement.
I also believe no one person can be good at everything, myself included, so I build great teams of people with complementary strengths. This means that I believe that best decisions come informed by a range of views, and that I respect a wide plurality of opinions. It also means that I choose to surround myself with people who are strong, which often requires negotiating conflicts.
How have I spent my first three weeks at the WMF:
-
Reading and watching: wikis, lists, talk pages, annual plans, reports, videos, emails and videos -
Dozens of 1:1s with staff, board, and community members -
Attending the Zurich hackathon -
Participating in the recent Board meeting -
Progress with ongoing decisions, such as the Terms of Use discussion -
Deep-dive into product roadmap and data analytics -
Four days of deep-dive and knowledge transfer with Sue -
IRC office hours, writing my first blog, and engaging on my talk page -
Training to be an even more effective communicator for the media -
Review of on-going product initiatives: mobile, Flow, and VE -
Recruiting
What I found to be challenging:
-
The extensive documentation, which provides plenty of context, but makes it hard to find distilled essences of historical decisions quickly. -
The complexity of the community, roles, differences in points of view and perspectives.
What is coming:
-
A deep-dive into a few selected projects that are already in the works, to understand where they are currently, what the expected outcomes are, and how we measure success; -
A retreat with the c-level leadership to align our work, and identify and address immediate Foundation priorities; and -
Starting the process for our next strategic planning exercise, which will be different from last time, and focused on improving our ability to react quickly and adjust as necessary to opportunities and challenges.
These are the things I’ve been working on -- but I know that there’s a lot more that you as community members have to offer, and much more that I can learn. Here’s just a few of the things I’m looking forward to from you:
-
Engaging with the strategic planning process; -
Continuing to provide feedback and on beta features, products, and ongoing projects and initiatives to help make them better, more useful, and lead to more successful outcomes; -
Help drive decision-making and consensus across the community through your individual leadership; -
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); and -
Your recommendations on community and WMF decision-making processes, while keeping in mind that no process is ever perfect but there is always room for improvement.
The past three weeks have made one thing very clear: it’s because of the energy and labor of each of you that we’re all here. On May 1st, I said that this was big in every way. The last three weeks have reinforced this for me: we have a huge mission, incredible opportunity, a vast number of users, and a strong unique community. I look forward to facing challenges together, having honest discussions, and coming together to seize opportunities in front of us. There will be much for us to learn from each other as we work together, and even more to do!
Lila
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources are scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest Wikimedia Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think we need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia Foundation developers and other staff specifically focused on the English Wikipedia and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such as Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no direct attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects" has become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the red-headed stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a goal to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
+1 Thank you for this write-up. Happy to read..:)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources are scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest Wikimedia Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think we need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia Foundation developers and other staff specifically focused on the English Wikipedia and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such as Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no direct attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects" has become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the red-headed stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a goal to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
+1
Great to hearing your experience. As being a new ED too (3 months now) I can indentify myself with your experience: the first month is about listening and getting to know :)
All the best for what is to come! Hope to meeting you asap!
Hugs from Argentina.
2014-05-28 2:48 GMT-03:00 Nurunnaby Chowdhury nh@nhasive.com:
+1 Thank you for this write-up. Happy to read..:)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you
are
probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources are scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest
Wikimedia
Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think we need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia
Foundation
developers and other staff specifically focused on the English Wikipedia and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such as Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no
direct
attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects" has become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the
red-headed
stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a
goal
to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia< http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive%3E Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundationhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Social Media Interaction Expert | The Daily Prothom-Alohttp://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
It is great to hear how you are working to learn about the vast Wikimedia community, its projects, its priorities and its challenges, Lila.
I'm thinking there's something else that all of us should help you celebrate as well: after only a few weeks on the job, being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women: http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/
That's a great start.
Risker
On 28 May 2014 08:58, Anna Torres anna@wikimedia.org.ar wrote:
+1
Great to hearing your experience. As being a new ED too (3 months now) I can indentify myself with your experience: the first month is about listening and getting to know :)
All the best for what is to come! Hope to meeting you asap!
Hugs from Argentina.
2014-05-28 2:48 GMT-03:00 Nurunnaby Chowdhury nh@nhasive.com:
+1 Thank you for this write-up. Happy to read..:)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed,
my
leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions
--
this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you
are
probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources are scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest
Wikimedia
Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think we need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia
Foundation
developers and other staff specifically focused on the English
Wikipedia
and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such
as
Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no
direct
attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects"
has
become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the
red-headed
stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a
goal
to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia< http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive%3E Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundationhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Social Media Interaction Expert | The Daily Prothom-Alohttp://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) <http://www.bdosn.org
Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Anna Torres Adell Directora Ejecutiva *A.C Wikimedia Argentina*
*Imprime este correo solo si es realmente necesario* _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Thank you, Risker -- we do have lots of work to do :)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
It is great to hear how you are working to learn about the vast Wikimedia community, its projects, its priorities and its challenges, Lila.
I'm thinking there's something else that all of us should help you celebrate as well: after only a few weeks on the job, being named to the Forbes list of the 100 most powerful women: http://www.forbes.com/profile/lila-tretikov/
That's a great start.
Risker
On 28 May 2014 08:58, Anna Torres anna@wikimedia.org.ar wrote:
+1
Great to hearing your experience. As being a new ED too (3 months now) I can indentify myself with your experience: the first month is about listening and getting to know :)
All the best for what is to come! Hope to meeting you asap!
Hugs from Argentina.
2014-05-28 2:48 GMT-03:00 Nurunnaby Chowdhury nh@nhasive.com:
+1 Thank you for this write-up. Happy to read..:)
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably
noticed,
my
leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions
--
this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that
you
are
probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and
to
know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources
are
scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest
Wikimedia
Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think
we
need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia
Foundation
developers and other staff specifically focused on the English
Wikipedia
and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such
as
Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no
direct
attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects"
has
become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the
red-headed
stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a
goal
to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia< http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive%3E Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundationhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Social Media Interaction Expert | The Daily Prothom-Alohttp://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) <
Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- Anna Torres Adell Directora Ejecutiva *A.C Wikimedia Argentina*
*Imprime este correo solo si es realmente necesario* _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org<
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wi...
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
MZMcBride -- We are a little bit in the tricky situation because our strategy has not been updated yet. Allocation should follow strategic priorities and it is the strategy that helps answer this question. On a more operational scale, resources tend go to where the users are or where the opportunity is. When they go to opportunity, it is towards verifying hypothesis that it would yield results.
I am thinking through this now and will post more thoughts as we begin planning for the strategy update.
L
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:24 PM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Lila Tretikov wrote:
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
[...]
Thank you for this write-up. It was nice to read. :-)
Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); [...]
I think this continues to be a huge pain point. Developer resources are scarce and expensive and there's often a feeling that the latest Wikimedia Foundation initiatives trump all other worthwhile projects. I think we need to find a better way to more fairly allocate resources.
As a concrete example, there continue to be dozens of Wikimedia Foundation developers and other staff specifically focused on the English Wikipedia and sometimes Wikimedia Commons, while the other sister projects such as Wiktionary, Wikibooks, and Wikisource continue to receive almost no direct attention. (Over the past few years, even the term "sister projects" has become mildly insulting. These projects are more accurately the red-headed stepchild projects.) This won't happen quickly, but we must make it a goal to do better in this area.
MZMcBride
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Thanks for this update.
Ii is refreshing to see both your will to act in accordance with our tradition of transparency and also to see your open curious approach to your new assignment (and your will to start up strategy work).
I get two reflections when I read through your mail.
Do not forget to learn of the real wikimedia world behind the SF office and the English community. With your background familiar with russian language, why not visit: *our Ukraine chapter where they have a fascinating story of their efforts with the Ukraine language and culture and being a key actor in the build up of an Ukrainian identity, which effect we have seen this year in the news daily (and where one member even had to our sorrow to pay with his life defending the rights on free knowledge for all on Euromajdan) *our Russian chapter where they have been extremely successful in keeping its independence (and existence) away from the autocratic authorizes and even winning respect from top key persons in their political hierarchy. And they have been most successful in our movement in fighting off some of the most awful POV attacks we have seen (in their case mostly from fascist)
Also do not forget to look into but what we are NOT doing in our swdevelopment, but ought to. We are seeing many commercial companies looking into how to make money from the content of Wikipedia by introducing new type of readers interfaces put on top of Wikipedia. There are Californain companies looking into developing a Q&A type of interface, and Google are for the moment nice to us, but what if they became less nice and steered away search hit away from Wikipedia?
Good luck in your job, and hope to meet you in some part of the strategic work that now soon seems to get started
Anders (being the most active contributer on Swedish Wikipedia & member of FDC until July 1)
Lila Tretikov skrev 2014-05-28 01:53:
Hello Wikimedians,
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
I believe the most precious commodity in life is time. I seek challenges worthy of it. I do not work for a job, I work for impact and I chose this role above all others because I believe this is a critical moment for the future of our movement.
I also believe no one person can be good at everything, myself included, so I build great teams of people with complementary strengths. This means that I believe that best decisions come informed by a range of views, and that I respect a wide plurality of opinions. It also means that I choose to surround myself with people who are strong, which often requires negotiating conflicts.
How have I spent my first three weeks at the WMF:
- Reading and watching: wikis, lists, talk pages, annual plans, reports, videos, emails and videos - Dozens of 1:1s with staff, board, and community members - Attending the Zurich hackathon - Participating in the recent Board meeting - Progress with ongoing decisions, such as the Terms of Use discussion - Deep-dive into product roadmap and data analytics - Four days of deep-dive and knowledge transfer with Sue - IRC office hours, writing my first blog, and engaging on my talk page - Training to be an even more effective communicator for the media - Review of on-going product initiatives: mobile, Flow, and VE - Recruiting
What I found to be challenging:
- The extensive documentation, which provides plenty of context, but makes it hard to find distilled essences of historical decisions quickly. - The complexity of the community, roles, differences in points of view and perspectives.
What is coming:
- A deep-dive into a few selected projects that are already in the works, to understand where they are currently, what the expected outcomes are, and how we measure success; - A retreat with the c-level leadership to align our work, and identify and address immediate Foundation priorities; and - Starting the process for our next strategic planning exercise, which will be different from last time, and focused on improving our ability to react quickly and adjust as necessary to opportunities and challenges.
These are the things I’ve been working on -- but I know that there’s a lot more that you as community members have to offer, and much more that I can learn. Here’s just a few of the things I’m looking forward to from you:
- Engaging with the strategic planning process; - Continuing to provide feedback and on beta features, products, and ongoing projects and initiatives to help make them better, more useful, and lead to more successful outcomes; - Help drive decision-making and consensus across the community through your individual leadership; - Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at once!); and - Your recommendations on community and WMF decision-making processes, while keeping in mind that no process is ever perfect but there is always room for improvement.
The past three weeks have made one thing very clear: it’s because of the energy and labor of each of you that we’re all here. On May 1st, I said that this was big in every way. The last three weeks have reinforced this for me: we have a huge mission, incredible opportunity, a vast number of users, and a strong unique community. I look forward to facing challenges together, having honest discussions, and coming together to seize opportunities in front of us. There will be much for us to learn from each other as we work together, and even more to do!
Lila _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Thanks Anders for the advice -- I will look into those. Maintaining freedom of speech is especially close to my heart.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Anders Wennersten <mail@anderswennersten.se
wrote:
Thanks for this update.
Ii is refreshing to see both your will to act in accordance with our tradition of transparency and also to see your open curious approach to your new assignment (and your will to start up strategy work).
I get two reflections when I read through your mail.
Do not forget to learn of the real wikimedia world behind the SF office and the English community. With your background familiar with russian language, why not visit: *our Ukraine chapter where they have a fascinating story of their efforts with the Ukraine language and culture and being a key actor in the build up of an Ukrainian identity, which effect we have seen this year in the news daily (and where one member even had to our sorrow to pay with his life defending the rights on free knowledge for all on Euromajdan) *our Russian chapter where they have been extremely successful in keeping its independence (and existence) away from the autocratic authorizes and even winning respect from top key persons in their political hierarchy. And they have been most successful in our movement in fighting off some of the most awful POV attacks we have seen (in their case mostly from fascist)
Also do not forget to look into but what we are NOT doing in our swdevelopment, but ought to. We are seeing many commercial companies looking into how to make money from the content of Wikipedia by introducing new type of readers interfaces put on top of Wikipedia. There are Californain companies looking into developing a Q&A type of interface, and Google are for the moment nice to us, but what if they became less nice and steered away search hit away from Wikipedia?
Good luck in your job, and hope to meet you in some part of the strategic work that now soon seems to get started
Anders (being the most active contributer on Swedish Wikipedia & member of FDC until July 1)
Lila Tretikov skrev 2014-05-28 01:53:
Hello Wikimedians,
I wanted to give you an update on my first three weeks of Wikimedia immersion -- this will also go on the blog. As you probably noticed, my leadership approach is rooted in observation and focused discussions -- this means I watch and listen more than I talk. But I expect that you are probably curious about what I have observed and learned so far, and to know a little more about who I am.
I believe the most precious commodity in life is time. I seek challenges worthy of it. I do not work for a job, I work for impact and I chose this role above all others because I believe this is a critical moment for the future of our movement.
I also believe no one person can be good at everything, myself included, so I build great teams of people with complementary strengths. This means that I believe that best decisions come informed by a range of views, and that I respect a wide plurality of opinions. It also means that I choose to surround myself with people who are strong, which often requires negotiating conflicts.
How have I spent my first three weeks at the WMF:
- Reading and watching: wikis, lists, talk pages, annual plans, reports, videos, emails and videos - Dozens of 1:1s with staff, board, and community members - Attending the Zurich hackathon - Participating in the recent Board meeting - Progress with ongoing decisions, such as the Terms of Use discussion - Deep-dive into product roadmap and data analytics - Four days of deep-dive and knowledge transfer with Sue - IRC office hours, writing my first blog, and engaging on my talk page - Training to be an even more effective communicator for the media - Review of on-going product initiatives: mobile, Flow, and VE - Recruiting
What I found to be challenging:
- The extensive documentation, which provides plenty of context, but
makes it hard to find distilled essences of historical decisions quickly. -
The complexity of the community, roles, differences in points of view and perspectives.
What is coming:
- A deep-dive into a few selected projects that are already in the
works, to understand where they are currently, what the expected outcomes are, and how we measure success; -
A retreat with the c-level leadership to align our work, and identify and address immediate Foundation priorities; and - Starting the process for our next strategic planning exercise, which will be different from last time, and focused on improving our
ability to react quickly and adjust as necessary to opportunities and challenges.
These are the things I’ve been working on -- but I know that there’s a lot more that you as community members have to offer, and much more that I can learn. Here’s just a few of the things I’m looking forward to from you:
- Engaging with the strategic planning process; - Continuing to provide feedback and on beta features, products, and ongoing projects and initiatives to help make them better, more
useful, and lead to more successful outcomes; -
Help drive decision-making and consensus across the community through your individual leadership; - Your recommendations on areas you see as priorities for development (while keeping in mind that not everything can be a priority at
once!); and -
Your recommendations on community and WMF decision-making processes, while keeping in mind that no process is ever perfect but there is
always room for improvement.
The past three weeks have made one thing very clear: it’s because of the energy and labor of each of you that we’re all here. On May 1st, I said that this was big in every way. The last three weeks have reinforced this for me: we have a huge mission, incredible opportunity, a vast number of users, and a strong unique community. I look forward to facing challenges together, having honest discussions, and coming together to seize opportunities in front of us. There will be much for us to learn from each other as we work together, and even more to do!
Lila _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org