I posted the two links in the pub of the dutch wiki, and 2 reactions are
worth mentioning.
One volunteer offered to look up scientific articles, as a student he has
free access to many science publishers through his university library. I had
more such offers in the past, and it may be worth to have a page for
volunteers who are willing to look up specific facts. That might be an
idead for other wikis. I doubt it would be legal to pass on an entire pdf.
The second remarked concerned established publishers like Springer and
Elsevier, who according to the volunteer offer authors the choice to pay a
bit more and have their publciatiuons open access. That sounds like an
interesting development to me.
Teun Spaans
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Melissa Hagemann <MHagemann(a)sorosny.org>wrote;wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, John Vandenberg
<jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> And if there is interest in advocating on
this issue, SPARC
developed
> the Alliance for Taxpayer Access
> (
http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/action/index.shtml) which represents
> universities, libraries, patient advocacy groups, and physicians
working
to
promote OA.
I haven't heard of this before.
The website/campaign name begs a lot of questions.
"Why tax-payer access only?"
The message of public access to publicly funded research resonates with
policymakers.
"What copyright license allows for tax-payer
only redistribution?"
Once it is available to the taxpayers who fund it, it is made freely
available online to everyone, in every country.
If I understand correctly, they are promoting
unrestricted access to
tax-payer funded research. Do they explicitly want govt-funded
research to be public domain, like US federal works are, and therefore
accessible to everyone, in every country?
Probably the biggest victory to date for the OA movement was a mandate
adopted by the U.S. NIH which stipulates that all the research funded by
the NIH (which amounts to approximately $29 billion annually) is now
made freely available through PubMed Central
(
http://publicaccess.nih.gov/). Now the OA movement in the U.S. is
trying to extend this type of mandate to all federal research funding
agencies with budgets over $100 million. Likewise, there are projects
underway in other countries to advocate for similar policies, including
an open letter recently announced which targets UK funding councils
(
http://tinyurl.com/64v9nvc). And finally, in addition to federal
research funding agencies, the OA movement also works with universities
to advocate for the adoption of institutional mandates which stipulate
that all research produced by those affiliated with a university or
faculty be made freely available (see OA policies adopted by several of
Harvard's Faculties
http://osc.hul.harvard.edu/).
So some progress, but much more to do!
Melissa
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l