I see following wikis hold secred information:
http://internal.wikimedia.org http://office.wikimedia.org http://board.wikimedia.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can NOT freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
On 31 December 2011 00:52, Jan Kučera kozuch82@gmail.com wrote:
I see following wikis hold secred information:
http://internal.wikimedia.org http://office.wikimedia.org http://board.wikimedia.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can NOT freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
We can imagine whatever worlds we like, but we have to live in the real world. In the real world, not everything can be made publicly available.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jan Kučera kozuch82@gmail.com wrote:
I see following wikis hold secred information:
http://internal.wikimedia.org http://office.wikimedia.org http://board.wikimedia.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can NOT freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
I don't want "the whole world" with the bank account info of the foundation accounts, the colo access information for the datacenters, the root passwords on things, the names and addresses of people who have verified IDs to the foundation in the course of business or in the course of abuse or content complaints.
Ask any open source project (be it code or information) to publicly announce the equivalent information and see how far you get...
The existence of the foundation is necessary to buffer "the encyclopedia" (and related projects) from the real world, forming a minimum necessary barrier and supporting structure.
The existing situation isn't perfect - the community, board, foundation staff are all wrestling with what degrees of openness work in which sectors, when we have time to discuss it and work on it. But it's closed to the degree necessary to function in its job and role.
Jan Kučera, 31/12/2011 01:52:
I see following wikis hold secred information:
http://internal.wikimedia.org http://office.wikimedia.org http://board.wikimedia.org
Try harder: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis
Nemo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
Jan Kučera, 31/12/2011 01:52:
I see following wikis hold secred information:
http://internal.wikimedia.org http://office.wikimedia.org http://board.wikimedia.org
Try harder: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis
Nemo
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
That page seems to be incomplete. I know for sure of some private wikis not listed
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez@gmail.com wrote:
That page seems to be incomplete. I know for sure of some private wikis not listed
Are you talking about http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/private.dblist or https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis?
AFAIK private.dblist is dynamically generated and up-to-date.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Patricio Molina patriciomolina@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez@gmail.com wrote:
That page seems to be incomplete. I know for sure of some private wikis not listed
Are you talking about http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/private.dblist or https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_wikis#Private_wikis?
meta's page
AFAIK private.dblist is dynamically generated and up-to-date.
-- Patricio Molina
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org