--- daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
Given the nature of writing press releases and the
need for an archive of
previous press releases, I support the idea of a separate wiki for
communications.
Yet press releases need to get input from various parts of an organization prior to
release and
everybody on the organization level should be aware of their drafting. How is having a
separate
wiki that can only be viewed and edited by communications committee members going to
faciliate
that?
Archived press releases should be, well, in the open on the foundation wiki, since those
documents
have already been released. It would be bizzare to do anything else. Having a public
archive of
past press releases is very common.
In general, as was pointed out, press releases should
be prepared in advance
of any event we know is in the making (but not yet public knowledge), and
not in a mad rush to get it done once the story breaks.
And how are those documents going to get prepared without help from various parts of the
organization that they pertain too?
It is even good to have a basic reserve of "dummy
press releases" that can
be filled in as necessary.
What is wrong with having that on InternalWiki?
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com