Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0: Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
Step 1: *Think* about the mistake you have made. What led you to make it? Were you acting on bad information? Without sufficient information? On intuition? Were you pressed by a deadline or by a strong opinion from someone else? Were you following a broken process? Did you act on the basis of circumstances you wish were the case rather than the circumstances that are in fact the case? (if it helps, consider writing down your answers to these questions, privately.)
Then, think about what can be redressed/undone/reverted about your mistake.
Step 2: *Think* about the prospects of making this mistake, or a mistake of its kind, again. How likely is it? Based on learning from this mistake, what steps are you able to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of its recurrence? Of those steps, which are you *willing* to take? Of those, which can you take right now, before responding in public? Which are you ready to commit to, longer term?
Step 3: Armed with your best thinking from Steps 1 and 2, write a concise(!) public e-mail acknowledging (as clearly and crisply as possible) -- a. that you have made a mistake b. what the mistake was, as precisely as possible (e.g. not "I used bad judgment" but "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica") c. what you have learned from making this mistake. d. what steps you have already taken to redress the damage or undo the results of your mistake. e. what steps you are going to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of a mistake of this sort recurring. (Include timelines for specific actions, if possible/applicable.) f. invite comments on your understanding as reflected in this e-mail. Explicitly encourage people to tell you if they think you've missed the point or if one of your intended actions is inadvisable, insufficient, or can otherwise be improved.
Step 4: Actually follow-through on the redressing/undoing actions and on the steps you've committed to taking. Take steps to ensure follow-up on steps that cannot be taken at once (e.g. if one of your corrective steps is to ensure X gets discussed in your next Annual General Meeting, set appropriate reminders to make sure that you actually discuss that by the time that AGM happens.)
Important notes: 1. Do not hesitate to ask for help at any step of this process. Either reach out to people whose judgment (and discreetness, if necessary) you trust, or publicly acknowledge you're having trouble with something (e.g. "Hi, folks. I'm thinking about this mistake, and I have a hard time figuring out how to balance the need for fresh data with the amount of time it takes to generate and review that data. Does anyone have some thoughts on how to best do that?")
2. In the public note, and throughout the process, be sure to *talk like a human being*. Avoid jargon; avoid sounding like your note has been prepared by a Damage Control Specialist. Just tell it like it is. People know the difference.
That's it. It's not as hard as it sounds.
*Q&A: *(this part isn't recycled)
Q: Should I really go through this whole thing every time I make a mistake? A: Ideally, yes. And it doesn't have to take very long, if you are in the habit of being honest in your own mind. However, as with everything, apply your good judgment, and use whatever abbreviated version of this you deem appropriate.
Q: Wouldn't following this result in drama and upset the community? A: No. On the contrary. Our community understands humans are fallible, and responds *very well* to (what it perceives as) honest admissions of error, commitments to improve, and (most of all) demonstrated learning.
Q: Still, there would be some drama, no? A: Yes, there may be some drama, in the short term. Have we mentioned humans are fallible?
Q: So, wouldn't it be better to silently learn the lessons and move on? A: No. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, as Judge Brandeis observed. Proper handling of mistakes is a sterling quality in anyone, and particularly important in a leader or public servant of any kind. It pays long-term dividends.
Q: What should I do when I see someone else is making a mistake? A: When you see others making mistakes, help them *see* them (first of all) and deal with them (e.g. by recycling this text, or by independently offering your analysis and answers to Steps 1 and 2 above).
Remember you make mistakes too, and be tolerant of the time it may take people to accept that they have made a mistake. (But you don't need to allow them to insist they have not made a mistake.)
Q: But isn't it true that organization/individual X made a mistake and didn't follow this process at all? A: Yes, it's true. And how did that work out?
Q: So are you saying you always adhere to this yourself? A: I try to, but I don't claim I always managed it.
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on? A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans.
Cheers,
A.
On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
<...>
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on? A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans.
Cheers,
A.
That was absolutely fabulous, thanks Asaf.
Cheers Yaroslav
+1 to Asaf & Yaroslav. Well put.
Shani.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
<...>
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on?
A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans.
Cheers,
A.
That was absolutely fabulous, thanks Asaf.
Cheers Yaroslav
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 11 Jan 2016, at 18:47, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hello, everyone. It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
<...>
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on? A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans. Cheers, A.
That was absolutely fabulous, thanks Asaf.
+1, that's a great post, Asaf! All very sensible advice. Can I suggest that you put a copy on Meta somewhere, so it doesn't get (too) lost over time / for easy future reference?
Thanks, Mike
Michael Peel email@mikepeel.net writes:
On 11 Jan 2016, at 18:47, Yaroslav M. Blanter putevod@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hello, everyone. It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
<...>
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on? A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans. Cheers, A.
That was absolutely fabulous, thanks Asaf.
+1, that's a great post, Asaf! All very sensible advice. Can I suggest that you put a copy on Meta somewhere, so it doesn't get (too) lost over time / for easy future reference?
+1
Yury Bulka [[User:Юрій Булка]]
On 11 January 2016 at 18:37, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement
That's very good, Is there a version (perhaps generic, rather than with Wikimedia context) online, that can be linked to from elsewhere?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 18:37, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of
advice I
have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement
That's very good, Is there a version (perhaps generic, rather than with Wikimedia context) online, that can be linked to from elsewhere?
Emboldened by these first few responses, I have posted it as an essay on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/So_you%27ve_made_a_mistake_and_it%27s_public...
Now that it's on a wiki, I encourage editing and improving this, of course. :)
A.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 2016-01-11 1:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
"I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica"
But, but... the editathon at McMurdo Station was a resounding success!
-- Marc
Plus I know of at least one donation made from Antarctica, that year i ran the fundraiser... If that isn't enough to justify chapter creation....
2016-01-11 20:58 GMT+01:00 Philippe Beaudette philippe@beaudette.me:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Marc A. Pelletier <mrc@uberbox.org marc@uberbox.org> wrote:
On 2016-01-11 1:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
"I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica"
But, but... the editathon at McMurdo Station was a resounding success!
-- Marc
Plus I know of at least one donation made from Antarctica, that year i ran the fundraiser... If that isn't enough to justify chapter creation....
Even commercial airline flies out there < http://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2015/11/30/boeing-757-lands-onantarctica-ic...
We should do a Wikimania there.
Back on the topic, thanks for this Email Asaf. It made me remember a very good workshop we had in Berlin at the #wmcon last year about not being ashame of our failure, and try to learn from it.
Philippe Beaudette
philippe@beaudette.me 415-691-8822 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 11 January 2016 at 19:58, Philippe Beaudette philippe@beaudette.me wrote:
Plus I know of at least one donation made from Antarctica, that year i ran the fundraiser... If that isn't enough to justify chapter creation....
And, of course, after much prodding from Lodewijk, in 2013 we had:
(September is not a good monument-hunting month, so I think all contributors had given us pictures from their existing collections...)
Asaf: wonderful piece as always.
I just wanted to pile on along with the three +1s I just approved in the moderation queue.
Austin
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0: Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
Step 1: *Think* about the mistake you have made. What led you to make it? Were you acting on bad information? Without sufficient information? On intuition? Were you pressed by a deadline or by a strong opinion from someone else? Were you following a broken process? Did you act on the basis of circumstances you wish were the case rather than the circumstances that are in fact the case? (if it helps, consider writing down your answers to these questions, privately.)
Then, think about what can be redressed/undone/reverted about your mistake.
Step 2: *Think* about the prospects of making this mistake, or a mistake of its kind, again. How likely is it? Based on learning from this mistake, what steps are you able to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of its recurrence? Of those steps, which are you *willing* to take? Of those, which can you take right now, before responding in public? Which are you ready to commit to, longer term?
Step 3: Armed with your best thinking from Steps 1 and 2, write a concise(!) public e-mail acknowledging (as clearly and crisply as possible) -- a. that you have made a mistake b. what the mistake was, as precisely as possible (e.g. not "I used bad judgment" but "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica") c. what you have learned from making this mistake. d. what steps you have already taken to redress the damage or undo the results of your mistake. e. what steps you are going to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of a mistake of this sort recurring. (Include timelines for specific actions, if possible/applicable.) f. invite comments on your understanding as reflected in this e-mail. Explicitly encourage people to tell you if they think you've missed the point or if one of your intended actions is inadvisable, insufficient, or can otherwise be improved.
Step 4: Actually follow-through on the redressing/undoing actions and on the steps you've committed to taking. Take steps to ensure follow-up on steps that cannot be taken at once (e.g. if one of your corrective steps is to ensure X gets discussed in your next Annual General Meeting, set appropriate reminders to make sure that you actually discuss that by the time that AGM happens.)
Important notes:
- Do not hesitate to ask for help at any step of this process. Either
reach out to people whose judgment (and discreetness, if necessary) you trust, or publicly acknowledge you're having trouble with something (e.g. "Hi, folks. I'm thinking about this mistake, and I have a hard time figuring out how to balance the need for fresh data with the amount of time it takes to generate and review that data. Does anyone have some thoughts on how to best do that?")
- In the public note, and throughout the process, be sure to *talk like a
human being*. Avoid jargon; avoid sounding like your note has been prepared by a Damage Control Specialist. Just tell it like it is. People know the difference.
That's it. It's not as hard as it sounds.
*Q&A: *(this part isn't recycled)
Q: Should I really go through this whole thing every time I make a mistake? A: Ideally, yes. And it doesn't have to take very long, if you are in the habit of being honest in your own mind. However, as with everything, apply your good judgment, and use whatever abbreviated version of this you deem appropriate.
Q: Wouldn't following this result in drama and upset the community? A: No. On the contrary. Our community understands humans are fallible, and responds *very well* to (what it perceives as) honest admissions of error, commitments to improve, and (most of all) demonstrated learning.
Q: Still, there would be some drama, no? A: Yes, there may be some drama, in the short term. Have we mentioned humans are fallible?
Q: So, wouldn't it be better to silently learn the lessons and move on? A: No. Sunlight is the best disinfectant, as Judge Brandeis observed. Proper handling of mistakes is a sterling quality in anyone, and particularly important in a leader or public servant of any kind. It pays long-term dividends.
Q: What should I do when I see someone else is making a mistake? A: When you see others making mistakes, help them *see* them (first of all) and deal with them (e.g. by recycling this text, or by independently offering your analysis and answers to Steps 1 and 2 above).
Remember you make mistakes too, and be tolerant of the time it may take people to accept that they have made a mistake. (But you don't need to allow them to insist they have not made a mistake.)
Q: But isn't it true that organization/individual X made a mistake and didn't follow this process at all? A: Yes, it's true. And how did that work out?
Q: So are you saying you always adhere to this yourself? A: I try to, but I don't claim I always managed it.
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on? A: I suggest it applies to every situation involving humans.
Cheers,
A.
-- Asaf Bartov Wikimedia Foundation http://www.wikimediafoundation.org
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! https://donate.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Hi All, and Asaf,
Thanks for the advice Asaf. I've made a mistake and processed steps 1 and 2. Step 3
- what the mistake was, as precisely as possible (e.g. not "I used bad judgment" but "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica");
I failed to welcome incoming directors to the board of the Wikimedia Foundation and I failed to thank outgoing directors of the same board for the time and effort they have spent.
- that you are sorry about the harm/damage/waste/confusion your mistake caused (being specific would demonstrate understanding);
I'm sorry for this unpolite and rude behavior.
- what you have learned from making this mistake;
The Wikimedia Movement depends on volunteers and on the willingness of capable people to contirbute their time and effort. Volunteers not only to edit Wikipedia and others projects, and commit to Gerrit but also spend time on governing bodies like the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. For the diverse communities of volunteering people in the movement to thrive it is esstential to retain a welcoming culture and show respect for those who do boring tasks and the janitoral work.
- what steps you have already taken to redress the damage or undo the results of your mistake;
So far I've done nothing to repair this mistake, except reading the ongoing discussion on wikimedia-l and thinking about what is going on and preparing this e-mail. To repair the damage done:
1. Hereby my welcome to Kelly Battles. Don't be shy to introduce yourself to this list. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 2. Hereby my welcome to Arnnon Geshuri. You left Google in 2009. I don't know if you were sacked or that you fled from the illegal practices you were forced to commit in your position at Google. I sincerely belief you have learned your lesson over six years ago. You now have a paid position at Tesla Motors, a company destined to disrupt the automobile industry. Welcome again to the Wikimedia movement which does not aim to disrupt the automobile industry. Wikipedia does disrupt a whole range of other industries, but please be aware that Wikipedia started after most paper encyclopedias were already out of print. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 3. La bienvenida al movimiento Jaime Villagomez. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board as CFO. I'll assume you will going to be or become Treasurer of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. You will have a pivotal role in assisting the BoT in performing a series of 'fiduciary duties'. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom in your job. 4. Goodbye James Heilman, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees. You've been fired. Don't take it personally. 5. Goodbye Stu West, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees. 6. Goodbye Jan-Bart de Vreede, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees.
- what steps you are going to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of a mistake of this sort recurring, including timelines for specific actions, if possible and applicable; and
My preferred habit of welcoming and thanking people is in real life meeting, to have the opportunity to shake hands, kiss, hug, whatever, and hand over a symbolic when I feel like to it. Opportunities for them abound, including, but not limited to the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin and Wikimania Esino Lario.
- invite comments on your understanding as reflected in this post, explicitly encouraging people to tell you if they think you've missed the point or if one of your intended actions is inadvisable, insufficient, or can otherwise be improved.
Please comment on my understanding as reflected in this post. Did I miss the point? Please tell me! What do you think about my intended and preferred way of welcoming incoming directors, and thanking outgoing directors? Is there a way to improve on this?
Ad Huikeshoven
P.S.
The board of Wikimedia Nederland will meet on Thursday January 21st. Wikimedia Nederland is an affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. It's mission is to further the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia Movement in the Netherlands. This mail was sent by me without it's content being read by fellow board members of Wikimedia Nederland, without the prior consent of the board of Wikimedia Nederland and without the prior approval of the message by the board of Wikimedia Nederland. So, I'm taking a deliberate risk.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0: Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
Step 1: *Think* about the mistake you have made. What led you to make it? Were you acting on bad information? Without sufficient information? On intuition? Were you pressed by a deadline or by a strong opinion from someone else? Were you following a broken process? Did you act on the basis of circumstances you wish were the case rather than the circumstances that are in fact the case? (if it helps, consider writing down your answers to these questions, privately.)
Then, think about what can be redressed/undone/reverted about your mistake.
Step 2: *Think* about the prospects of making this mistake, or a mistake of its kind, again. How likely is it? Based on learning from this mistake, what steps are you able to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of its recurrence? Of those steps, which are you *willing* to take? Of those, which can you take right now, before responding in public? Which are you ready to commit to, longer term?
Thank you Ad! Hi everyone, I am Kelly : ) !
Seriously, very happy to be part of this amazing effort. Have lots to learn but committed to doing my best. Thank you everyone for giving me this opportunity. Happy New Year and here is to a great 2016! Best, Kelly
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Ad Huikeshoven ad@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Hi All, and Asaf,
Thanks for the advice Asaf. I've made a mistake and processed steps 1 and 2. Step 3
- what the mistake was, as precisely as possible (e.g. not "I used bad
judgment" but "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica");
I failed to welcome incoming directors to the board of the Wikimedia Foundation and I failed to thank outgoing directors of the same board for the time and effort they have spent.
- that you are sorry about the harm/damage/waste/confusion your mistake
caused (being specific would demonstrate understanding);
I'm sorry for this unpolite and rude behavior.
- what you have learned from making this mistake;
The Wikimedia Movement depends on volunteers and on the willingness of capable people to contirbute their time and effort. Volunteers not only to edit Wikipedia and others projects, and commit to Gerrit but also spend time on governing bodies like the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. For the diverse communities of volunteering people in the movement to thrive it is esstential to retain a welcoming culture and show respect for those who do boring tasks and the janitoral work.
- what steps you have already taken to redress the damage or undo the
results of your mistake;
So far I've done nothing to repair this mistake, except reading the ongoing discussion on wikimedia-l and thinking about what is going on and preparing this e-mail. To repair the damage done:
- Hereby my welcome to Kelly Battles. Don't be shy to introduce
yourself to this list. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 2. Hereby my welcome to Arnnon Geshuri. You left Google in 2009. I don't know if you were sacked or that you fled from the illegal practices you were forced to commit in your position at Google. I sincerely belief you have learned your lesson over six years ago. You now have a paid position at Tesla Motors, a company destined to disrupt the automobile industry. Welcome again to the Wikimedia movement which does not aim to disrupt the automobile industry. Wikipedia does disrupt a whole range of other industries, but please be aware that Wikipedia started after most paper encyclopedias were already out of print. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 3. La bienvenida al movimiento Jaime Villagomez. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board as CFO. I'll assume you will going to be or become Treasurer of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. You will have a pivotal role in assisting the BoT in performing a series of 'fiduciary duties'. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom in your job. 4. Goodbye James Heilman, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees. You've been fired. Don't take it personally. 5. Goodbye Stu West, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees. 6. Goodbye Jan-Bart de Vreede, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees.
- what steps you are going to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of a
mistake of this sort recurring, including timelines for specific actions, if possible and applicable; and
My preferred habit of welcoming and thanking people is in real life meeting, to have the opportunity to shake hands, kiss, hug, whatever, and hand over a symbolic when I feel like to it. Opportunities for them abound, including, but not limited to the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin and Wikimania Esino Lario.
- invite comments on your understanding as reflected in this post,
explicitly encouraging people to tell you if they think you've missed the point or if one of your intended actions is inadvisable, insufficient, or can otherwise be improved.
Please comment on my understanding as reflected in this post. Did I miss the point? Please tell me! What do you think about my intended and preferred way of welcoming incoming directors, and thanking outgoing directors? Is there a way to improve on this?
Ad Huikeshoven
P.S.
The board of Wikimedia Nederland will meet on Thursday January 21st. Wikimedia Nederland is an affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. It's mission is to further the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia Movement in the Netherlands. This mail was sent by me without it's content being read by fellow board members of Wikimedia Nederland, without the prior consent of the board of Wikimedia Nederland and without the prior approval of the message by the board of Wikimedia Nederland. So, I'm taking a deliberate risk.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of
advice I
have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0: Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
Step 1: *Think* about the mistake you have made. What led you to make it? Were you acting on bad information? Without sufficient information? On intuition? Were you pressed by a deadline or by a strong opinion from someone else? Were you following a broken process? Did you act on the basis of circumstances you wish were the case rather than the
circumstances
that are in fact the case? (if it helps, consider writing down your answers to these questions, privately.)
Then, think about what can be redressed/undone/reverted about your
mistake.
Step 2: *Think* about the prospects of making this mistake, or a mistake of its kind, again. How likely is it? Based on learning from this mistake,
what
steps are you able to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of its recurrence? Of those steps, which are you *willing* to take? Of those, which can you take right now, before responding in public? Which are you ready to commit to, longer term?
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Thanks Asaf for sharing this (for last 3 days I am thinking to send this email)
Hello Kelly :)
On 14 January 2016 at 12:27, Kelly Battles kbattles@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thank you Ad! Hi everyone, I am Kelly : ) !
Seriously, very happy to be part of this amazing effort. Have lots to learn but committed to doing my best. Thank you everyone for giving me this opportunity. Happy New Year and here is to a great 2016! Best, Kelly
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Ad Huikeshoven ad@wikimedia.nl wrote:
Hi All, and Asaf,
Thanks for the advice Asaf. I've made a mistake and processed steps 1 and 2. Step 3
- what the mistake was, as precisely as possible (e.g. not "I used bad
judgment" but "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund Wikimedia Antarctica");
I failed to welcome incoming directors to the board of the Wikimedia Foundation and I failed to thank outgoing directors of the same board for the time and effort they have spent.
- that you are sorry about the harm/damage/waste/confusion your
mistake
caused (being specific would demonstrate understanding);
I'm sorry for this unpolite and rude behavior.
- what you have learned from making this mistake;
The Wikimedia Movement depends on volunteers and on the willingness of capable people to contirbute their time and effort. Volunteers not only
to
edit Wikipedia and others projects, and commit to Gerrit but also spend time on governing bodies like the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. For the diverse communities of volunteering people in the movement to thrive it is esstential to retain a welcoming culture and
show
respect for those who do boring tasks and the janitoral work.
- what steps you have already taken to redress the damage or undo the
results of your mistake;
So far I've done nothing to repair this mistake, except reading the
ongoing
discussion on wikimedia-l and thinking about what is going on and
preparing
this e-mail. To repair the damage done:
- Hereby my welcome to Kelly Battles. Don't be shy to introduce
yourself to this list. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 2. Hereby my welcome to Arnnon Geshuri. You left Google in 2009. I
don't
know if you were sacked or that you fled from the illegal practices
you
were forced to commit in your position at Google. I sincerely belief
you
have learned your lesson over six years ago. You now have a paid position at Tesla Motors, a company destined to disrupt the automobile
industry.
Welcome again to the Wikimedia movement which does not aim to disrupt the automobile industry. Wikipedia does disrupt a whole range of other industries, but please be aware that Wikipedia started after most
paper
encyclopedias were already out of print. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board. 3. La bienvenida al movimiento Jaime Villagomez. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom while serving your time on the board as CFO. I'll assume you will going to be or become Treasurer of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation. You will have a pivotal role in assisting
the
BoT in performing a series of 'fiduciary duties'. I wish you a lot of strength and wisdom in your job. 4. Goodbye James Heilman, and thanks for volunteering your time on the Board of Trustees. You've been fired. Don't take it personally. 5. Goodbye Stu West, and thanks for volunteering your time on the
Board
of Trustees. 6. Goodbye Jan-Bart de Vreede, and thanks for volunteering your time
on
the Board of Trustees.
- what steps you are going to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of a
mistake of this sort recurring, including timelines for specific actions, if possible and applicable; and
My preferred habit of welcoming and thanking people is in real life meeting, to have the opportunity to shake hands, kiss, hug, whatever, and hand over a symbolic when I feel like to it. Opportunities for them
abound,
including, but not limited to the Wikimedia Conference in Berlin and Wikimania Esino Lario.
- invite comments on your understanding as reflected in this post,
explicitly encouraging people to tell you if they think you've missed the point or if one of your intended actions is inadvisable, insufficient, or can otherwise be improved.
Please comment on my understanding as reflected in this post. Did I miss the point? Please tell me! What do you think about my intended and preferred way of welcoming incoming directors, and thanking outgoing directors? Is there a way to improve on this?
Ad Huikeshoven
P.S.
The board of Wikimedia Nederland will meet on Thursday January 21st. Wikimedia Nederland is an affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. It's mission is to further the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia Movement in the Netherlands. This mail was sent by me without it's content being read by fellow board members of Wikimedia Nederland, without the prior consent of the board of Wikimedia Nederland and without the prior approval of the message by the board of Wikimedia Nederland.
So,
I'm taking a deliberate risk.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Asaf Bartov abartov@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of
advice I
have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0: Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
Step 1: *Think* about the mistake you have made. What led you to make it?
Were
you acting on bad information? Without sufficient information? On intuition? Were you pressed by a deadline or by a strong opinion from someone else? Were you following a broken process? Did you act on the basis of circumstances you wish were the case rather than the
circumstances
that are in fact the case? (if it helps, consider writing down your answers to these questions, privately.)
Then, think about what can be redressed/undone/reverted about your
mistake.
Step 2: *Think* about the prospects of making this mistake, or a mistake of its kind, again. How likely is it? Based on learning from this mistake,
what
steps are you able to take to mitigate or reduce the odds of its recurrence? Of those steps, which are you *willing* to take? Of
those,
which can you take right now, before responding in public? Which are
you
ready to commit to, longer term?
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org