David Gerard wrote:
No, it would be to tag it {{historical}} or similar,
i.e. not
currently active. If you can show me where I have proposed any such
thing be deleted ...
No, not you, but I can point you to two postings where Alex
Schenck screams out loud on this list that all of meta is useless
and obsolete and needs to be deleted all over. And *that* is what
I have reacted against in both of my messages. He clearly talks of
a "clean canvas" and building the new "from the ground up". There
is no provision for keeping *any* of the old material, because in
his mind everything we now have just sucks.
The first was on March 25,
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2006-March/006399.html
The second was yesterday,
http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2006-March/006526.html
--
Lars Aronsson (lars(a)aronsson.se)
Aronsson Datateknik -
http://aronsson.se