Hi,
I see there is now a "meta-l" list: http://mail.lists.wikipedia.be/mailman/listinfo/meta-l_lists.wikipedia.be
Could it be transferred to the standard lists.wikimedia.org ? IMO it makes more sense to have all the Wikimedia lists at one place.
Perhaps it is worth having a discussion about what the role of such a list is, too? (when should one post to meta-l, and when should one post to foundation-l?)
cheers Brianna
On 6/28/07, Brianna Laugher brianna.laugher@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I see there is now a "meta-l" list: http://mail.lists.wikipedia.be/mailman/listinfo/meta-l_lists.wikipedia.be
Could it be transferred to the standard lists.wikimedia.org ? IMO it makes more sense to have all the Wikimedia lists at one place.
Agreed.
Perhaps it is worth having a discussion about what the role of such a list is, too? (when should one post to meta-l, and when should one post to foundation-l?)
On meta-l perhaps? Or [[m:Babel]].
cheers Brianna
-- They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: http://modernthings.org/
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher@...> writes:
Hi,
I see there is now a "meta-l" list: http://mail.lists.wikipedia.be/mailman/listinfo/meta-l_lists.wikipedia.be
Could it be transferred to the standard lists.wikimedia.org ? IMO it makes more sense to have all the Wikimedia lists at one place.
This list is an "Ad interim" list. If/when the final list is created the subscribers will be transferred and this list closed. See; http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Babel#Meta-l
Perhaps it is worth having a discussion about what the role of such a list is, too? (when should one post to meta-l, and when should one post to foundation-l?)
cheers Brianna
Meta-l is to be used for matters that are specific about or relevant for MetaWiki. I think it will be a low traffic list.
Walter
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ? What subjects would this list deal with ?? Thanks, GerardM
On 6/28/07, Walter Vermeir walter@wikipedia.be wrote:
Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher@...> writes:
Hi,
I see there is now a "meta-l" list:
http://mail.lists.wikipedia.be/mailman/listinfo/meta-l_lists.wikipedia.be
Could it be transferred to the standard lists.wikimedia.org ? IMO it makes more sense to have all the Wikimedia lists at one place.
This list is an "Ad interim" list. If/when the final list is created the subscribers will be transferred and this list closed. See; http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Babel#Meta-l
Perhaps it is worth having a discussion about what the role of such a list is, too? (when should one post to meta-l, and when should one post to foundation-l?)
cheers Brianna
Meta-l is to be used for matters that are specific about or relevant for MetaWiki. I think it will be a low traffic list.
Walter
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
As the name says, it is about ehm, "meta" :) The MetaWIki, actually :)
BR, Lodewijk
2007/6/28, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com:
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ? What subjects would this list deal with ?? Thanks, GerardM
On 6/28/07, Walter Vermeir walter@wikipedia.be wrote:
Brianna Laugher <brianna.laugher@...> writes:
Hi,
I see there is now a "meta-l" list:
http://mail.lists.wikipedia.be/mailman/listinfo/meta-l_lists.wikipedia.be
Could it be transferred to the standard lists.wikimedia.org ? IMO it makes more sense to have all the Wikimedia lists at one place.
This list is an "Ad interim" list. If/when the final list is created the subscribers will be transferred and this list closed. See; http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Babel#Meta-l
Perhaps it is worth having a discussion about what the role of such a list is, too? (when should one post to meta-l, and when should one post to foundation-l?)
cheers Brianna
Meta-l is to be used for matters that are specific about or relevant for MetaWiki. I think it will be a low traffic list.
Walter
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
GerardM wrote:
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ? What subjects would this list deal with ??
Nothing -- there's no purpose for such a list. :)
- -- brion vibber (brion @ wikimedia.org)
On 6/28/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ?
can issues relating to multiple projects, chapters, board, and governance be discusses in the meta list?
azdiyy
On 28/06/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ?
-- Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Hoi, That is exactly what the foundation-l is for I would say. Thanks, GerardM
On 6/29/07, Azdiyy azdiyy@googlemail.com wrote:
can issues relating to multiple projects, chapters, board, and governance be discusses in the meta list?
azdiyy
On 28/06/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, What is meant by MetaWiki ?
-- Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
i will start with the warning-less indef ban by one of meta [[en:Category:Rouge admins]] who blocked my ip with no warning and protected my talkpage. time for [[m:association of rouge stewards]]?
thanks, azdiyy
Hoi, It is a great start that will ensure that nobody will subscribe to this list. Thanks, GerardM
On 6/29/07, Azdiyy azdiyy@googlemail.com wrote:
i will start with the warning-less indef ban by one of meta [[en:Category:Rouge admins]] who blocked my ip with no warning and protected my talkpage. time for [[m:association of rouge stewards]]?
thanks, azdiyy
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
You've lost me here... First you talk of "chapters, board and governance" and then of your meta block. Sure you recognise that these two things are not really the same? Michael
On 6/29/07, Azdiyy azdiyy@googlemail.com wrote:
i will start with the warning-less indef ban by one of meta [[en:Category:Rouge admins]] who blocked my ip with no warning and protected my talkpage. time for [[m:association of rouge stewards]]?
thanks, azdiyy
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-May/030517.html http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10098
what do you suggest if admins on irc do not want to get involved, foundation list is no the place, and friends of teh blocking admin dont want to upset him? an azdiyy list that no one reads? bug=∞
azdiyy
rather than deflowering a white list or asking where one can complain about certain stewards i will be using a sock puppet on meta ;) thanks to ignore all rules, the blocking admin and i have the same justification.
azdiyy
On 29/06/07, Azdiyy azdiyy@googlemail.com wrote:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-May/030517.html http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10098
what do you suggest if admins on irc do not want to get involved, foundation list is no the place, and friends of teh blocking admin dont want to upset him? an azdiyy list that no one reads? bug=∞
azdiyy
On 29/06/07, Azdiyy azdiyy@googlemail.com wrote:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-May/030517.html http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10098 what do you suggest if admins on irc do not want to get involved, foundation list is no the place, and friends of teh blocking admin dont want to upset him? an azdiyy list that no one reads? bug=∞
Perhaps that you've made your complaint but everyone reading it finds it groundless?
- d.
Perhaps that you've made your complaint but everyone reading it finds it groundless?
- d.
http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%AF%D9%8...
the link shows how policy is made on ar wp. images should do for ar-0. users are now voting on *sysop selection policy* while it is still changing. it's not clear who can or cannot vote, nor is it clear how the results (kinda poll) will be calculated. for 2 months one candidate could not become sysop as some admins insist on counting neutral votes as against. wikipedia is no democracy; ar wp is a messy one right now. how can meta help? when blocking me the meta admin said: "If you have complaints about ar:wp users, complain on ar:wp." one steward told me to leave ar wp for 6 months, another suggested i use a sockpuppet there. considering that one ar sysop claimed the positive cu was due to an evil roommate who registered shortly after his block to carry on his edit wars, and another sockpuppet claimed unspeakable attacks were due to an easy password, and noting that one ar sysop said that creating 10 sockpuppets *OK* and no one objected, i don't think anyone can prove me a sockpuppet accoring to ar wp standards. as my main account is blocked on meta, i am not sure i am so. care to know that one policy *proposal* was used to justify 10s of indef bans. it all started here: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-March/028370.html and it is still a proposal. one day they may understand [[Help:Modifying and Creating policy]]
ps. not about my ban, this email is [[category:humor]] azdiyy
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org