If the question is indiscreet/offtopic forgive me and ignore it/more it another list, but: what are Romney's views on copyright? I read on today's Financial Times Europe (p. 4) that he has a couple millions dollars invested on Hollywood funds, so is it pessimistic to say that he must hold horrible positions on copyright?
Nemo
On 29 October 2012 13:39, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
If the question is indiscreet/offtopic forgive me and ignore it/more it another list, but: what are Romney's views on copyright? I read on today's Financial Times Europe (p. 4) that he has a couple millions dollars invested on Hollywood funds, so is it pessimistic to say that he must hold horrible positions on copyright?
Both parties appear to strongly support the present regime.
- d.
David Gerard wrote:
On 29 October 2012 13:39, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
If the question is indiscreet/offtopic forgive me and ignore it/more it another list, but: what are Romney's views on copyright? I read on today's Financial Times Europe (p. 4) that he has a couple millions dollars invested on Hollywood funds, so is it pessimistic to say that he must hold horrible positions on copyright?
Both parties appear to strongly support the present regime.
I'm not sure this is totally fair.
I think the White House has somewhat embraced Creative Commons for certain works and there's some good work going on at http://www.data.gov.
Of course, all works of the United States federal government done by federal employees are automatically public domain, so in many ways, the U.S. government is way ahead of the curve on this issue. ;-)
Regarding Mr. Romney in particular, he seems to be very pro-corporation/pro-business, so I don't expect any major changes to copyright law should he be elected President.
MZMcBride
MZMcBride, 29/10/2012 16:12:
Regarding Mr. Romney in particular, he seems to be very pro-corporation/pro-business, so I don't expect any major changes to copyright law should he be elected President.
You mean except extension of copyright protection over Mickey Mouse to 120 years? :p
Nemo
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:12 AM, MZMcBride z@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 29 October 2012 13:39, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemowiki@gmail.com wrote:
If the question is indiscreet/offtopic forgive me and ignore it/more it another list, but: what are Romney's views on copyright? I read on today's Financial Times Europe (p. 4) that he has a couple millions dollars invested on Hollywood funds, so is it pessimistic to say that he must hold horrible positions on copyright?
Both parties appear to strongly support the present regime.
I'm not sure this is totally fair.
I think the White House has somewhat embraced Creative Commons for certain works and there's some good work going on at http://www.data.gov.
Of course, all works of the United States federal government done by federal employees are automatically public domain, so in many ways, the U.S. government is way ahead of the curve on this issue. ;-)
And though it's not directly tied to the White House, several US agencies have made good progress on copyright and open access initiatives during the last four years; I'm thinking of, for instance, the NIH deposit mandate and NSF data sharing rules. And I think we are all familiar with the recent stellar work of the National Archives :) Obama did speak out against SOPA in the end, as well.
In general I think there is overall friendliness towards open access and open licensing in this government, more so than we've seen in the past, if not yet towards real copyright reform -- which as a matter of law would take Congress as well as the White House to agree anyway.
-- phoebe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org