Do you think that the right to be forgotten may change something in the Wikipedia's sources and in the work done by volunteers to write Wikipedia?
Google announced that they will apply the right to be forgotten in Europe and some names may disappear in the big search engine.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/30/google-launches-right-to-b...
Regards
As I understand it, the "right to be forgotten" will only affect the discoverability of content, rather than existence of content.
So if we rely on a source which says that person X did Y many years ago, and X succeeds in invoking their "right to be forgotten", then the source will no longer appear in search engine results. The source, whether offline or online, will continue to exist and will continue to be a valid reference.
My understanding may well be wrong, and if there is anything that summarises this issue as it affects Wikimedians I would be really interested to read it.
Chris
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think that the right to be forgotten may change something in the Wikipedia's sources and in the work done by volunteers to write Wikipedia?
Google announced that they will apply the right to be forgotten in Europe and some names may disappear in the big search engine.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/30/google-launches-right-to-b...
Regards
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Wikipedia: Ilario https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ilario Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Yes, I know.
But I think that something will change for users writing content (no more references in the main search engine) but also to discover copyright infringements.
Regards
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Chris Keating chriskeatingwiki@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, the "right to be forgotten" will only affect the discoverability of content, rather than existence of content.
So if we rely on a source which says that person X did Y many years ago, and X succeeds in invoking their "right to be forgotten", then the source will no longer appear in search engine results. The source, whether offline or online, will continue to exist and will continue to be a valid reference.
My understanding may well be wrong, and if there is anything that summarises this issue as it affects Wikimedians I would be really interested to read it.
Chris
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ilario Valdelli valdelli@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think that the right to be forgotten may change something in the Wikipedia's sources and in the work done by volunteers to write
Wikipedia?
Google announced that they will apply the right to be forgotten in Europe and some names may disappear in the big search engine.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/30/google-launches-right-to-b...
Regards
-- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Wikipedia: Ilario https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ilario Tel: +41764821371 http://www.wikimedia.ch _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 30/05/2014 14:11, Chris Keating wrote:
As I understand it, the "right to be forgotten" will only affect the discoverability of content, rather than existence of content.
So if we rely on a source which says that person X did Y many years ago, and X succeeds in invoking their "right to be forgotten", then the source will no longer appear in search engine results. The source, whether offline or online, will continue to exist and will continue to be a valid reference.
My understanding may well be wrong, and if there is anything that summarises this issue as it affects Wikimedians I would be really interested to read it.
Chris
Its the compilation of such data that is the issue. A newspaper may record that X was fined for jaywalking in 1976, another newspaper may record that they were in court for not paying taxes in 1982. Someone or organization that goes about and collates all of those snippets of information to write a report on X is data processing, it does not matter whether the collection of the data is manual or not. The issue then comes down to whether such information is made available for retrieval. I'd assume that WP articles fulfill all the necessary requirements. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Protection_Directive#Content
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org