There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see:
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/ http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692
Klaus Graf
Hoi, I had a read of the first one. While it is nice that there is an understanding that copyright has to do with authorship, the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright. This is best understood in the way they define the types of copyright: *commercial *scholarly
In this way it is forgotten that there is research by people who are none of the above. In this duopoly it is easy to give to companies what should not be theirs in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
2009/7/13 Klaus Graf klausgraf@googlemail.com
There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see:
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/ http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692
Klaus Graf
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
"the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright"
unfounded and untrue.
I wish you health and true happiness. teun
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi, I had a read of the first one. While it is nice that there is an understanding that copyright has to do with authorship, the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright. This is best understood in the way they define the types of copyright: *commercial *scholarly
In this way it is forgotten that there is research by people who are none of the above. In this duopoly it is easy to give to companies what should not be theirs in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
2009/7/13 Klaus Graf klausgraf@googlemail.com
There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see:
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/ http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692
Klaus Graf
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Hoi, Why ? Thanks, GerardM
2009/7/13 teun spaans teun.spaans@gmail.com
"the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright"
unfounded and untrue.
I wish you health and true happiness. teun
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.comwrote:
Hoi, I had a read of the first one. While it is nice that there is an understanding that copyright has to do with authorship, the fact of the matter is that it is not the author that benefits from copyright. This is best understood in the way they define the types of copyright: *commercial *scholarly
In this way it is forgotten that there is research by people who are none of the above. In this duopoly it is easy to give to companies what should
not
be theirs in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
2009/7/13 Klaus Graf klausgraf@googlemail.com
There are much morer statements than by Hamma and Hirtle, see:
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/5405864/ http://hangingtogether.org/?p=692
Klaus Graf
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org