2015-09-06 13:22 GMT+02:00 Steinsplitter Wiki <steinsplitter-wiki(a)live.com>om>:
Hoi,
"Article Placeholders are automatically generated content pages in
Wikipedia or other mediawiki projects displaying data from Wikidata."
Seriously? RobotWiki? Do we really want this? Quality, not quantity.
Yeah. I REALLY want this.
From:
gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:35:31 +0200
To: wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] LsJbot and geonames
Hoi,
As always I have been a big fan of the wonderful work that has been done.
My reaction was very much for what I perceived as a negative reaction
from
Ricordisamoa. Telling you to stop and become part
of Wikidata is a bit
off.
Asking for collaboration and work towards a
common goal, a goal that you
very much want to share as I perceive it in your reply is most wonderful
and most welcome.
When your data is at a quality level where you create stubs, it is very
much at the level where we should have it in Wikidata. Obviously it is
for
the Swedish community to have the stubs or
experiment with cached
articles
based on Wikidata data. Obviously, we are at a
point where we can create
the stubs and where caching concepts is technically feasible but not
something we have done so far.
What does it take to have such an experiment?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 6 September 2015 at 11:23, Anders Wennersten <
mail(a)anderswennersten.se>
wrote:
> At svwp we work closely with Wikidata and see it as the natural base
for
> our article substance. And we follow closely
Phabricator and are eager
to
> implement it as soon as it will be feasible
to implement. And Lsjbot
is in
> no way counteractive to these. It will be
easy to exchange Lsjbot
article
> with Phabricator generated ones when time is
right.
>
> But I believe you miss the point with what Lsjbot is doing now. The
> extensive research etc done on data in Geonames is one of the crucial
> efforts. And in a way all this generation project is a research on the
> viability to use this data for full in all language versions. If it
still
> is seen as viable we could extend our
article coverage for geographical
> entities with a factor 10 in all versions. And this research is a must
even
> independently of which technique is used to
generate the articles.
>
> The other crucial effort is the extended intelligence built into the
> generation of facts in the articles. To find out close by physical
object
> by clever algorithms is a intellectual
effort of highest dignity. First
> when bot generating was introduced, it was more or less a mapping of
items
> from input to items in output (in articles).
We now see how more info
is
> created by info only implicit existing in
input and where it is
combined
> with external (map) data
>
> I can not enough press on how much I am impressed by Sverkers
outstanding
> intellectual effort and his creativity in
implementing and running
software
> that is of great help reaching our common
vision "free knowledge for
all".
>
> Anders
>
>
>
>
>
> Den 2015-09-06 kl. 08:50, skrev Gerard Meijssen:
>
>> Hoi,
>> PLEASE reconsider. A Wikidata based solution is not superior because
it
>> started from Wikidata.
>>
>> PLEASE consider collaboration. It will be so much more powerful when
>> LSJBOT
>> and people at Wikidata collaborate. It will get things right the first
>> time. It does not have to be perfect from the start as long as it gets
>> better over time. As long as we always work on improving the data.
>>
>> PLEASE consider text generation based on Wikidata. They are the
scripts
>> LSJBOT uses, they can help us improve
the text when more or better
>> information becomes available.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 6 September 2015 at 08:25, Ricordisamoa <
ricordisamoa(a)openmailbox.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Proper data-based stubs are being worked on:
>>>
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/1416/
>>> Lsjbot, you have no chance to survive make your time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Il 06/09/2015 02:40, Anders Wennersten ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Geonames [1] is a database which holds around 9 M entries of
geographical
>>>> related items from all over the
world.
>>>>
>>>> Lsjbot is now generating articles from a subset of it, after several
>>>> months of extensive research on its quality, Wikidata relations and
>>>> notability issues. While the quality in some regions is substandard
(and
>>>> these will not be generated) it
was seen as very good in most
areas. In
>>>> the discussion I was intrigued
to learn that identical Arabic names
>>>> should
>>>> be transcribed differently depending on its geographic location.
And I
>>>> was
>>>> fascinated of the question of notability of wells in the Bahrain
desert
>>>> (which in the end was excluded,
mostly because we knew too little of
>>>> that
>>>> reality)
>>>>
>>>> In this run Lsjbot has extended its functionality even further then
when
>>>> it generated articles for
species. It looks for relevant
geographical
>>>> items
>>>> close to the actual one: a lake close by, a mountain and where is
the
>>>> nearest major town etc.
>>>>
>>>> Macedonia can be taken as one example. Lsjbot generated over 10000
>>>> articles (and 5000 disambiguous pages) making it a magnitude more
than
>>>> what
>>>> exist in enwp. Also for a well defined type like villages, almost
50% as
>>>> many has been generated than
existing in enwp. One example [2]
where you
>>>> can see what has been generated
(and note the reuse of a relevant
figure
>>>> existing in frwp). Please
compare the corresponding articles on
other
>>>> languages in this case, many
having less information than the bot
>>>> generated
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>> The generation is still in early stage [3) but has already got the
>>>> article count for svwp to pass 2 M today. But it will take many
months
>>>> more before completed and
perhaps more M marks will be passed
before it
>>>> is
>>>> through. If you want to give feedback you are welcome to enter it
at [4]
>>>>
>>>> Anders
>>>> (with all credits for the Lsjbot to be given to Sverker, its owner,
I am
>>>> just one of the many supporters
of him and his bot on svwp)
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
http://www.geonames.org/about.html
>>>>
>>>> [2]
>>>>
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaki_%28ort_i_Makedonien%29
>>>>
>>>> [3]
>>>>
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategori:Robotskapade_geografiartiklar
>>>>
>>>> [4]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndardiskussion:Lsjbot/Projekt_alla_p…
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l ,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>