Hoi, There is a short period of time left before the switch over from the GFDL license is to happen. What I observe is that it will be likely at the last moment when the decision will be taken. The problem is that this is too late.
It is too late because there are many websites who have selected the GFDL because Wikipedia has this license as well. Where the people in the know are aware that this magical deadline is approaching many of the people involved are not.
It is for this reason that I urge us, the board to make a decision and publish it widely because the GFDL is a viral license and it will make cooperation with these people legally impossible. That would be the same tragedy as it is a tragedy that we currently cannot legaly cooperate with the websites that do use the CC-by-sa. Thanks, GerardM
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, There is a short period of time left before the switch over from the GFDL license is to happen. What I observe is that it will be likely at the last moment when the decision will be taken. The problem is that this is too late.
It is too late because there are many websites who have selected the GFDL because Wikipedia has this license as well. Where the people in the know are aware that this magical deadline is approaching many of the people involved are not.
It is for this reason that I urge us, the board to make a decision and publish it widely because the GFDL is a viral license and it will make cooperation with these people legally impossible. That would be the same tragedy as it is a tragedy that we currently cannot legaly cooperate with the websites that do use the CC-by-sa.
The board's plan hasn't changed, which is to make the decision in April after a community vote. Assuming we can get the vote started soon enough, the board could act at its meeting at the beginning of April. I'm not going to allow any decision to get pushed beyond the end of April regardless. That would still allow outside parties three months for whatever processes they need to make their decisions. I know it would always be nice to have more time, but delays will always expand to fill the space available, so deadline pressure is not a bad thing.
--Michael Snow
Hoi, Thank you.. Gerard
2009/2/23 Michael Snow wikipedia@verizon.net
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, There is a short period of time left before the switch over from the GFDL license is to happen. What I observe is that it will be likely at the
last
moment when the decision will be taken. The problem is that this is too late.
It is too late because there are many websites who have selected the GFDL because Wikipedia has this license as well. Where the people in the know
are
aware that this magical deadline is approaching many of the people
involved
are not.
It is for this reason that I urge us, the board to make a decision and publish it widely because the GFDL is a viral license and it will make cooperation with these people legally impossible. That would be the same tragedy as it is a tragedy that we currently cannot legaly cooperate with the websites that do use the CC-by-sa.
The board's plan hasn't changed, which is to make the decision in April after a community vote. Assuming we can get the vote started soon enough, the board could act at its meeting at the beginning of April. I'm not going to allow any decision to get pushed beyond the end of April regardless. That would still allow outside parties three months for whatever processes they need to make their decisions. I know it would always be nice to have more time, but delays will always expand to fill the space available, so deadline pressure is not a bad thing.
--Michael Snow
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org