Le 12 févr. 2014 04:20, "Nathan" <nawrich(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Delphine Ménard <notafishz(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> Le 12 févr. 2014 00:10, "Nathan" <nawrich(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Well, it's actually pretty straightforward. For members of the Board of
> Trustees, FDC and AffCom, as well as Board members of all Chapters. All
of
> us are volunteers. We do not get any salary from
Chapters or
Foundation. In
> short, we do the work we do here for free.
>
> In our capacity as "members", and in order to allow us to fulfill our
> duties towards the organisations/committees that we are part of and thus
> towards the Wikimedia movement, we do get some or all of our travel
> expenses and/or attendance fees for Wikimedia conferences reimbursed
out of
> "movement funds" (chapters or
foundation budgets) insofar as our
presence
> in an official capacity is deemed useful.
>
> Hope this clarifies the strange notion you seem to be putting forward of
> anyone of those of us *speaking in a personal capacity* having any kind
of
financial
benefit.
Best,
Delphine
(Speaking in her capacity as Delphine, you know, the not-a-fish)
Perhaps you misunderstood what I was wondering about, which is probably my
fault as I was trying to avoid giving any specific examples. But without
at
all attempting to disparage her or suggest that her
intentions are
anything
but sincere, let's take the example of Nicole
Ebbers. She of course
discloses in her e-mail signature that she is an employee of WMDE, so its
clear (though not stated in the form of a disclosure) that her income
depends, in part, on WMF funding. It's typical in professional
circumstances, at least in my business, to disclose personal conflicts
when
discussing virtually any topic where the audience
would not naturally
assume that a conflict exists.
Ah I see. So I suppose, following your line of thought, that any and all of
the wikimedia staff (all organisations included) involved in any part of
the fundraising should attach some kind of disclaimer about how they
"benefit" from the work they're paid to do? Since, after all, they're
working to raise money that *will* pay their salary.
This might prove an interesting thing to implement.
Delphine