Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
On 10/02/2014 07:24 PM, James Heilman wrote:
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Beyond this, and (IMO) even more importantly, it means that we are succeeding at our mission where it counts. That a Wikipedia article in medecine is reasonably considered as the basis for a peer reviewed is an acheivement it iself; that it /was/ in fact published is nothing short of a crowning acheivement.
-- Marc
Big congrats James!
And:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Marc A. Pelletier marc@uberbox.org wrote:
On 10/02/2014 07:24 PM, James Heilman wrote:
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Beyond this, and (IMO) even more importantly, it means that we are succeeding at our mission where it counts. That a Wikipedia article in medecine is reasonably considered as the basis for a peer reviewed is an acheivement it iself; that it /was/ in fact published is nothing short of a crowning acheivement.
Agreed, and very well said, Marc. -Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
Congratulations, James - and everyone else who worked on this. This is a significant achievement, not only because of the publishing of the article itself, but for what it heralds more broadly, as Coren said.
Warmly, Anasuya
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Nice work, James. Rock on, /a
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Anasuya Sengupta asengupta@wikimedia.org wrote:
Congratulations, James - and everyone else who worked on this. This is a significant achievement, not only because of the publishing of the article itself, but for what it heralds more broadly, as Coren said.
Warmly, Anasuya
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
*Anasuya SenguptaSenior Director of GrantmakingWikimedia Foundation*
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! Support Wikimedia https://donate.wikimedia.org/ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Kudos, doc! You've done it again. :)
A.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Nice work, James Cheers, Peter
-----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Heilman Sent: 03 October 2014 01:24 AM To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8313 - Release Date: 10/02/14
Wow! It's great a see a Wikipedia article being published in a peer-reviewed journal! Congratulations to James and others who gave efforts for it.It will definitely strengthen Wikipedia's reliability as an encyclopedia.
Tanweer Wikimedia Bangladesh
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Peter Southwood < peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
Nice work, James Cheers, Peter
-----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of James Heilman Sent: 03 October 2014 01:24 AM To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8313 - Release Date: 10/02/14
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Umm, no, they aren't - at least not in the way the term is used in scientific subjects.
Many articles are never reviewed in any systematic manner; in fact, that is the overwhelming majority of our articles. Those that are formally reviewed are reviewed in the context of meeting *Wikipedia* standards: formatting, manual of style, reliable sources as references (as opposed to, say, blogs). It doesn't contain most of the elements of peer review seen for scientific papers.
Risker/Anne
On 3 October 2014 15:56, Erlend Bjørtvedt erlend@wikimedia.no wrote:
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Erlend Bjørtvedt* Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway Mob: +47 - 9225 9227 http://no.wikimedia.org http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikipedia articles are passively peer reviewed every time someone with knowledge of the topic reads the article. Ideally, this would be the equal of scientific peer review. In reality, most such people don’t bother giving feedback, or are unable to figure out how to give feedback. Hopefully we can get better at encouraging and supporting such feedback in the future.
I’ve systematically reviewed Wikipedia articles in the past, and I’ve also persuaded others to do the same. However, systematic review isn’t the same as a formal review through a journal.
It’s great to see that this article has been formally reviewed, although it is disappointing to see how short the author list for the formal article is here, given how many people have actually contributed to the article over the years.
Thanks, Mike
On 3 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
Umm, no, they aren't - at least not in the way the term is used in scientific subjects.
Many articles are never reviewed in any systematic manner; in fact, that is the overwhelming majority of our articles. Those that are formally reviewed are reviewed in the context of meeting *Wikipedia* standards: formatting, manual of style, reliable sources as references (as opposed to, say, blogs). It doesn't contain most of the elements of peer review seen for scientific papers.
Risker/Anne
On 3 October 2014 15:56, Erlend Bjørtvedt erlend@wikimedia.no wrote:
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Erlend Bjørtvedt* Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway Mob: +47 - 9225 9227 http://no.wikimedia.org http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 10/03/2014 06:58 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
It’s great to see that this article has been formally reviewed, although it is disappointing to see how short the author list for the formal article is here, given how many people have actually contributed to the article over the years.
In the corresponding blog post/editorial, you see them struggle with that very problem and fail to find a solution that is entirely satisfactory; they chose to do the "obvious" thing and credit directly the people who have participated in the review process /itself/, and link to the Wikipedia history page for the detail.
It's not perfect, but it's a surprisingly difficult problem to solve given how radically different the editing traditions are (something they go into details about themselves).
-- Marc
Not really P
-----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto:wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Great work James! Congratulation.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Peter Southwood < peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
Not really P
-----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Erlend Bjørtvedt* Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway Mob: +47 - 9225 9227 http://no.wikimedia.org http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8318 - Release Date: 10/03/14
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Yeah, this is really a great thing! Just remember not to communicate, in a way, that "at last, we have a peer reviewed Wikipedia article!".. . I have myself had twho scientific articles peer reviewed for Scientific periodicals, and know very well that this is quite a process.
But then we also have the kind of articles that have not been formally peer reviewed in that sense, but are still Wikipedia-peer reviewed and of extraordinary standard.
In 2010, PhD / psychiatrist Øystein Eiring wrote a large number of medical articles to Norwegian Wikipedia.
One example is the entry on Schizofrenia
http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizofreni
It was started by many writers, including doctors "Reodor" and "Sigve", both physicians. With Dr Eiring the article (and many others) got a serious Scientific boost and has 217 References. It has had 156 different contributors, and the Three mentioned doctors have both changed each others' contributors and had their own wordings changed. As much as 3,5 KB of doctor "Sigve"'s text, has been removed or changed.
This is the wonderful beauty of Wikipedia peer review!
Best regards Erlend Bjørtvedt
2014-10-04 8:52 GMT+02:00 Nurunnaby Hasive nh@nhasive.com:
Great work James! Congratulation.
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Peter Southwood < peter.southwood@telkomsa.net> wrote:
Not really P
-----Original Message----- From: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org [mailto: wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Erlend Bjørtvedt Sent: 03 October 2014 09:57 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] First Wikipedia Article has been Formally Peer Reviewed and Published
But remember: all Wikipedia articles are peer reviewed......
Erlend Bjørtvedt
Den fredag 3. oktober 2014 skrev Vishnu visdaviva@gmail.com følgende:
Congratulations!
A great model that could be emulated by many of us across other disciplines too.
Cheers, Vishnu
On Friday 03 October 2014 04:54 AM, James Heilman wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Erlend Bjørtvedt* Nestleder, Wikimedia Norge Vice chairman, Wikimedia Norway Mob: +47 - 9225 9227 http://no.wikimedia.org http://no.wikimedia.org/wiki/About_us _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4037/8318 - Release Date: 10/03/14
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
-- *Nurunnaby Chowdhury Hasive* Administrator | Bengali Wikipedia http://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:nhasive Member | IEG Committee, Wikimedia Foundation https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/People Social Media Interaction Moderator | The Daily Prothom-Alo http://www.prothom-alo.com Bangladesh Ambassador | Open Knowledge Foundation Network http://www.okfn.org Treasurer | Bangladesh Open Source Network (BdOSN) http://www.bdosn.org Task Force Member | Mozilla Bangladesh http://www.mozillabd.org fb.com/nhasive | @nhasive http://www.twitter.com/nhasive | Skype: nhasive | www.nhasive.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
James - I suggest you (or someone) draft a post for the WIkimedia blog on the topic: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Blog
On 3 October 2014 00:24, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
James -- this is really great, thank you for sharing.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
The day has finally come- Amazing and Congratulations!
Emily Blanchard Talent Acquisition Team Wikimedia Foundation eblanchard@wikimedia. eblanchard@gmail.comorg Follow us on Twitter @wikimediaatwork http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home Become a Contributor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse Join Us: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Work_with_us Developers Join the Fun: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Communication
*Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share inthe sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!*
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Lila Tretikov lila@wikimedia.org wrote:
James -- this is really great, thank you for sharing.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Will soon be pubmed indexed. Editorial regarding the efforts are here http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565
Hope these sorts of efforts will improve the reputation of Wikipedia and the number of contributors. I guess we will see.
This is wonderful news; happy to hear it :)
-rachel
-- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 3 October 2014 00:24, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
Article published by the journal Open Medicine http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564
Congratulations!
I know your and J. De Wolff's user names, but the other two are harder to find. Is there a reason they're not made apparent? Can you give them here, without "outing" anyone?
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org