Dear Wikimedia friends,
For the 9th time since the Funds Dissemination Committee was created, the Annual Plan Grants process needs your eyes, brains and analytic skills. Since October 1st, 11 Wikimedia affiliates have posted their proposal for review by the FDC...and you. These consist of annual plans and budgets, with a detail of what programs and activities those organizations are planning for the year 2017.
This opens the time for community review, a month long process in which we need as many people as possible giving their feedback on the proposals, asking questions or clarifications and analyzing the initiatives that our movement affiliates have developped for the year to come.
In November, the FDC will meet to make recommendations to Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees on how to allocate movement funds to these affiliates in order to achieve the most impact. Your input and participation will be valuable as they make these recommendations.
You can find the proposals linked from the Community review portal here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2016-2017_round_1 The organizations whose proposals, plans and budgets are available for your review include: Amical Wikimedia, Wikimedia Argentina, Wikimedia CH, Wikimedia Deutschland e.V., Wikimedia Israel, Wikimedia Nederland, Wikimedia Serbia, Wikimedia Sverige, Wikimedia UK Wikimedia Ukraine, Wikimedia Österreich
You can leave your feedback on the proposal discussion page.
Visit the annual plan grant portal [*] for more information about the program, the FDC, or upcoming milestones. You can reach the FDC support staff at FDCsupport@wikimedia.org. More information about past APG rounds, recommendations, reports from organizations can be found on the proposal page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals
*More about community review*: The APG proposal submission date is followed by a 30-day open comment period, when anyone is invited to provide input on and ask questions about a specific proposal on its discussion page. Applicants are also expected to respond to input and questions during this period, although they are not able to change the proposal form itself after the submission date.
The FDC will review the discussion pages during their deliberations in November as one of many inputs to the decision-making process. While anyone may comment on proposals after the open comment period closes on 31 October, the FDC may not be able to take comments made after this period into consideration when reaching its decisions.
*How to review*: Please visit the community review page to view the proposals being considered and follow the instructions. While the proposals are only available in English, your comments can be in any language.
*Why your feedback matters*: We hope this open comment period will add to an in-depth and robust review of each proposal, and help keep our grantmaking transparent and collaborative. The FDC highly values feedback and insights from the Wikimedia community in making its funding recommendations.
Thank you for the time you’ll take to review these proposals,
Best,
Delphine
For anyone interested in the continuing conversation about "how to define impact in the Wikimedia movement", I have pulled together a table of the different metrics that APG requestors are proposing for their programmes. this is the first year that organisations have been asked to submit their own cross-organisation metrics in addition to the WMF's global metrics (a very sensible response in my view to the numerous problems with global metrics...)
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:APG/Proposals#Summary_of_grantee...
A few observations: The following areas appear several times: diversity of contributors, quality of contributions, retention of contributors, amount/quality of volunteer engagement, growth in network of partner institutions, and communications metrics. Also interestingly of the 3 organisations reporting on "quality" only one is using a pre-existing community process to do so, while two have developed their own.
Regards,
Chris
User:The Land
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Delphine Ménard dmenard@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Wikimedia friends,
For the 9th time since the Funds Dissemination Committee was created, the Annual Plan Grants process needs your eyes, brains and analytic skills. Since October 1st, 11 Wikimedia affiliates have posted their proposal for review by the FDC...and you. These consist of annual plans and budgets, with a detail of what programs and activities those organizations are planning for the year 2017.
This opens the time for community review, a month long process in which we need as many people as possible giving their feedback on the proposals, asking questions or clarifications and analyzing the initiatives that our movement affiliates have developped for the year to come.
In November, the FDC will meet to make recommendations to Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees on how to allocate movement funds to these affiliates in order to achieve the most impact. Your input and participation will be valuable as they make these recommendations.
You can find the proposals linked from the Community review portal here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2016-2017_round_1 The organizations whose proposals, plans and budgets are available for your review include: Amical Wikimedia, Wikimedia Argentina, Wikimedia CH, Wikimedia Deutschland e.V., Wikimedia Israel, Wikimedia Nederland, Wikimedia Serbia, Wikimedia Sverige, Wikimedia UK Wikimedia Ukraine, Wikimedia Österreich
You can leave your feedback on the proposal discussion page.
Visit the annual plan grant portal [*] for more information about the program, the FDC, or upcoming milestones. You can reach the FDC support staff at FDCsupport@wikimedia.org. More information about past APG rounds, recommendations, reports from organizations can be found on the proposal page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals
*More about community review*: The APG proposal submission date is followed by a 30-day open comment period, when anyone is invited to provide input on and ask questions about a specific proposal on its discussion page. Applicants are also expected to respond to input and questions during this period, although they are not able to change the proposal form itself after the submission date.
The FDC will review the discussion pages during their deliberations in November as one of many inputs to the decision-making process. While anyone may comment on proposals after the open comment period closes on 31 October, the FDC may not be able to take comments made after this period into consideration when reaching its decisions.
*How to review*: Please visit the community review page to view the proposals being considered and follow the instructions. While the proposals are only available in English, your comments can be in any language.
*Why your feedback matters*: We hope this open comment period will add to an in-depth and robust review of each proposal, and help keep our grantmaking transparent and collaborative. The FDC highly values feedback and insights from the Wikimedia community in making its funding recommendations.
Thank you for the time you’ll take to review these proposals,
Best,
Delphine
Delphine Ménard Program Officer, Annual Plan Grants Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org