Hey John. Not sure we why at WMC should be interested? Can you explain
further...
James Heilman
Wikimedia Canada
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:11 AM, <foundation-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>wrote;wrote:
Send foundation-l mailing list submissions to
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
foundation-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
foundation-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of foundation-l digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Spanish website blocking law implemented (emijrp)
2. Re: the limits for fundraising. Was Blnk tag jokes are now
obsolete. (Thomas Dalton)
3. Reminder: IRC office hours with the WMF features team, Jan.
4th 2012 (Steven Walling)
4. Re: Spanish website blocking law implemented (Kim Bruning)
5. Re: Spanish website blocking law implemented (Christophe Henner)
6. Re: Spanish website blocking law implemented (Kim Bruning)
7. Canadian consultation on Trans Pacific Partnership
(John Vandenberg)
8. Re: A fundraiser for editors (Yaroslav M. Blanter)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:02:32 +0100
From: emijrp <emijrp(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Spanish website blocking law implemented
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<CAPgALA73SE0QBZBbDSvokfk-3Q_CTUXjU4uXZ5FrtTKMshK-qw(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
http://gigaom.com/2012/01/04/how-spains-version-of-sopa-is-setting-the-web-…
2012/1/4 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
> emijrp, 04/01/2012 18:59:
> > With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain can
> block
> > any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
> > _links_ to copyrighted works. Including Google, Wikipedia or whatever.
> > Without a judge.
> That's entirely different!
> > For further details, search for
an analysis.
> The slashdot post links end up to a 6
months old WSJ article, is there
> some more recent one you recommend? (Also Spanish.)
> Thanks,
> Nemo
>
_______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:13:30 +0000
From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] the limits for fundraising. Was Blnk tag
jokes are now obsolete.
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<CALTQcce67b9xZ5ofPFJ1AmaNgEgjJOQwuZBrDyF2HzGEq84axA(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 4 January 2012 16:24, Oliver Keyes <okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Check the IP history; Jan-Bart added them ;p
Now I'm on an actual computer and not trying to go through page
histories on my phone, I've taken a closer look. The bit about being
truthful was in the initial version. The other bit is the result of
edits from several people (including me, although I'm not sure any of
my wording survived the process).
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:48:03 -0800
From: Steven Walling <swalling(a)wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Foundation-l] Reminder: IRC office hours with the WMF
features team, Jan. 4th 2012
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<CAMryOMW11Gy7EPA=6iUMQsGPe4jmTkGziD8PD=Vgm9Bk=Wcfxg(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
Reminder that this is happening at 23:00 in #wikimedia-office.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Steven Walling <swalling(a)wikimedia.org>
Date: Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Subject: IRC office hours with the WMF features team, Jan. 4th 2012
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Hey everyone,
Since folks have been asking about it, I wanted to announce that the
features development team at the Wikimedia Foundation will be holding an
office hours (in #wikimedia-office) about the general past, present, and
future of MediaWiki features being worked on here at the WMF.
This will be on January 4th, 2012 at 23:00 UTC. Documentation is on Meta
for time conversion and IRC how-tos.[1]
--
Steven Walling
Community Organizer at Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org
1.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours
--
Steven Walling
Community Organizer at Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:29:09 +0100
From: Kim Bruning <kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Spanish website blocking law implemented
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <20120105172909.A22444(a)bruning.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:02:32PM +0100, emijrp wrote:
http://gigaom.com/2012/01/04/how-spains-version-of-sopa-is-setting-the-web-…
> 2012/1/4 Federico Leva (Nemo)
<nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
> > emijrp, 04/01/2012 18:59:
> > > With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain can
> > block
> > > any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
> > > _links_ to copyrighted works. Including Google, Wikipedia or
whatever.
> > > Without a judge.
>
More links off of slashdot:
http://torrentfreak.com/us-threatened-to-blacklist-spain-for-not-implementi…
To make a long story short, the USA is already pushing for SOPA in other
countries. The game is afoot. I wonder if we've missed other countries that
might
implement similar legislation soon?
In any case, it might be a good idea to check how and if the new spanish
laws (will) affect WMF, and what measures need to be taken to stay safe for
now.
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 18:27:12 +0100
From: Christophe Henner <christophe.henner(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Spanish website blocking law implemented
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<CAFaJbjeeY6-R_8T2Ox4P3oCPR5Qo4eEMYTp61fqzuaVRY1P9XQ(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In France we we're that far [me showing a little space between my
fingers] to get a similar law in 2006 and 2009. The law passed but all
the "site blocking" things were removed following some lobbying (in
which WMFr did not take part but some of the members did on a personal
level).
All the plan for similar laws has been postponed due to the 2012
elections (presidential and parliement) but we know lobbyist are
pushing forward to get it back on track. They actualy tried to had it
through our online gambling law, but failed.
Christophe
On 5 January 2012 17:29, Kim Bruning <kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:02:32PM +0100, emijrp
wrote:
>
http://gigaom.com/2012/01/04/how-spains-version-of-sopa-is-setting-the-web-…
>
2012/1/4 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki(a)gmail.com>
>
> > emijrp, 04/01/2012 18:59:
> > > With this law, a special team in the Ministry of Culture of Spain
can
> > block
> > > any (for-profit or non-profit) website, from Spain or overseas, that
> > > _links_ to copyrighted works. Including Google, Wikipedia or
whatever.
>> > > Without a judge.
>>
> More links off
of slashdot:
http://torrentfreak.com/us-threatened-to-blacklist-spain-for-not-implementi…
> To make a long story short, the USA is already pushing for SOPA in other
countries. The game is afoot. I wonder if we've missed other countries that
might
> implement similar legislation soon?
> In any case, it might be a good idea
to check how and if the new spanish
laws (will) affect WMF, and what measures need to be taken to stay safe for
now.
> sincerely,
> ? ? ? ?Kim Bruning
> --
>
_______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:14:18 +0100
From: Kim Bruning <kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Spanish website blocking law implemented
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <20120106191418.A30118(a)bruning.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
And canada is considering pushing back the public domain 20 years, under
... us influence yet again.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6225/125/
(Proposed and existing) US policy (foreign and domestic) is not really
in favor of wikimedia at the moment, is it? :-/
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 09:35:42 +1100
From: John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com>
Subject: [Foundation-l] Canadian consultation on Trans Pacific
Partnership
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Cc: Wikimedia Canada list <wikimedia-ca(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<CAO9U_Z6T5AVza5O01RBwbiKCqk7NBCG=ZB_HdC4nQk_1Hgvd4A(a)mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=windows-1252
subject was: Spanish website blocking law implemented
Canadian public consultation on TPP closes February 14, 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_Pacific_Partnership
Is WMF and/or WM-CA intending to submit their views? How can we help!?
Do we have a list of submissions to govt.by the Wikimedia community? e.g.
there was an EU submission last year, and here is a WM-AU one
http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Submission_on_Australian_Digital_Future_Di…
--
John Vandenberg
DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE CONSULTATIONS ON
POTENTIAL FREE TRADE AGREEMENT NEGOTIATIONS WITH TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP
MEMBERS
The Government of Canada is seeking the views of Canadians on the scope of
possible free trade negotiations between Canada and Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP) members, which include
- Australia
- Brunei Darussalam
- Chile (see footnote
1)<
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2011/2011-12-31/html/notice-avis-eng.ht…
- Malaysia
- New Zealand
- Peru (see footnote
2)<
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2011/2011-12-31/html/notice-avis-eng.ht…
- Singapore
- United States (see footnote
3)<
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2011/2011-12-31/html/notice-avis-eng.ht…
- Vietnam
Additional countries have also expressed their interest in consultations on
joining the discussions:
- Japan
- Mexico (see footnote
4)<
http://canadagazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2011/2011-12-31/html/notice-avis-eng.ht…
This notice is part of the Government of Canada?s domestic consultation
process with business, citizen-based organizations and individual
Canadians, as well as with provincial and territorial governments, to
obtain advice and views on priorities, objectives and concerns to help
outline the parameters of this initiative.
Background
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a free trade agreement under
negotiation to liberalize trade in the Asia-Pacific region. Nine countries
are currently participating in the negotiations: Australia, Brunei
Darussalam, Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, Vietnam and the
United States. Japan and Mexico have recently announced their intentions to
begin consultations to join the TPP. With the participation of Canada,
Mexico and Japan, the TPP would represent a market of more than 775 million
people and a combined GDP of $25.7 trillion (or US$24.9 trillion) ? a
market larger than the European Union.
The intent of TPP negotiators is to create an ambitious, high-standard
regional free trade agreement that covers a wide range of areas related to
trade and investment. On November 12, 2011, leaders of the TPP member
countries meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii, for the Asia Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) forum announced the achievement of a broad outline of an
agreement that would enhance trade and investment, promote innovation,
economic growth and development, and create and sustain jobs. Nine rounds
of negotiations have taken place.
Following review of the November 2011 outline released by TPP members,
Canada notes the high degree of complementarity between what is being
pursued in the TPP and the approach Canada takes in its own trade
negotiations.
Additional information on the TPP can be found at
www.ustr.gov/tpp (in
English only).
Submissions by interested parties
The Government is embarking on a public consultation process to allow all
interested stakeholders an early opportunity to provide comments, input and
advice on possible free trade negotiations with TPP countries (current nine
members and other interested countries: Japan and Mexico). It is essential
that the Government of Canada be fully aware of the interests and potential
sensitivities of Canadians with respect to this initiative. We welcome
advice and views on any priorities, objectives and concerns relating to
possible free trade negotiations with TPP countries. In particular, we are
seeking views with respect to the following:
- Opinions on areas of goods export interest (identified by Harmonized
System [HS]/Tariff codes, if possible), including products that would
benefit from the early removal of tariffs and other barriers by TPP
countries.
- Views on market access liberalization for TPP countries products
(identified by HS/Tariff codes, if possible) into the Canadian market,
including input on those products for which the elimination of tariffs
should be expedited or phased-in over time.
- Advice and views on trade in services, particularly the identification
of sectors/activities of export interest for Canadian service providers,
and opinions on domestic regulatory measures that restrict or otherwise
affect market access for Canadian service providers.
- Advice, views and experiences regarding the temporary entry of
business persons from Canada into TPP countries and into Canada from TPP
countries (e.g. impediments to entering or working in TPP countries on a
temporary basis, including licensing or certification requirements at the
border).
- Advice, views and experiences regarding measures affecting exports
destined for TPP countries, including non-tariff barriers (such as import
licensing), technical barriers to trade (including technical regulations,
standards and/or conformity assessment procedures) and sanitary and
phytosanitary measures.
- Views on general rules of origin and/or advice on appropriate rules of
origin for specific products or sectors.
- Advice on ?trade facilitation? issues (e.g. significant impediments
related to import procedures).
- Advice, views and experiences with customs procedures and with
commercial goods entering and/or leaving TPP countries.
- Advice, views and experiences regarding investment barriers faced by
Canadian investors in TPP countries, including restrictions imposed on
foreign ownership or entry to market, questions of transparency of
regulation, performance requirements (i.e. local content requirements,
use
of local labour and services), and any other impediments/barriers.
- Advice and views on government procurement markets of interest to
Canadian suppliers and exporters to TPP countries, including the
government
departments, agencies or enterprises of interest and the goods, services
or
construction services that Canadian suppliers are interested in selling
to
those government organizations. Note that participation in government
procurement may include bidding as the prime contractor or exporting
goods
and/or services to the prime contractor who in turn bids on government
contracts.
- Advice, views and experiences regarding barriers (e.g. availability
and transparency of information, domestic preferences) when selling or
attempting to sell to governments of TPP countries.
- Views and experiences with the protection of intellectual property
rights.
- Advice and views on competition policy matters, including development
of possible cooperation mechanisms.
- Views on capacity-building measures that could assist developing
countries in achieving the objectives of the agreement.
- Views on ways to reflect the interests and values of Canadians in the
area of sustainable development, environmental protection and
conservation.
- Views on ways to reflect the interests and values of Canadians in the
areas of workers? rights, human rights, transparency in business and
commercial practices and other social concerns, as they relate to TPP
countries.
- Views on other related issues not mentioned above.
All interested parties are invited to submit their views by February 14,
2012. Please be advised that any information received as a result of this
consultation will be considered as public information, unless explicitly
stated otherwise. Submissions should include
1. the contributor?s name and address and, if applicable, his/her
organization, institution or business;
2. the specific issues being addressed; and
3. precise information on the rationale for the positions taken,
including any significant impact it may have on Canada?s domestic or
foreign interests.
Contributions can be sent by email to consultations@ international.gc.ca,
by fax to 613-944-3489 or by mail to Trade Negotiations Consultations
(TPP), Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada, Trade Policy and
Negotiations Division II (TPW), Lester B. Pearson Building, 125 Sussex
Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G2.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kim Bruning <kim(a)bruning.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Spanish website blocking law implemented
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
And canada is considering pushing back the public domain 20 years, under
... us influence yet again.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6225/125/
(Proposed and existing) US policy (foreign and domestic) is not really
in favor of wikimedia at the moment, is it? :-/
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:11:24 +0400
From: "Yaroslav M. Blanter" <putevod(a)mccme.ru>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] A fundraiser for editors
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
<foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID: <a928845e4d5d105163894dd69f1c005a(a)mccme.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Actually, do we have somewhere a concise page with a list of say ten most
urgent needs we need money for? Smth a banner can link to?
Cheers
Yaroslav
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
End of foundation-l Digest, Vol 94, Issue 10
********************************************