The message below is about the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ( http://plato.stanford.edu/), an online freely-available reference work that is expert-produced. It's supported by an "endowment" which is supported not only by Stanford and an NEH matching grant but also funds contributed by academic libraries as "membership dues", basically as a good-faith effort to keep the project alive. (http://www.solinet.net/survey/sep.htm). It's an interesting model and not one I've seen before. Their endowment goal is $4,125,000 to cover their costs "in perpetuity"; I'd be interested to know how they arrived at this number.
-- phoebe
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:37:56 -0500 From: Robert Michaelson rmichael@NORTHWESTERN.EDU To: PAMNET@listserv.nd.edu Subject: GENERAL: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Please excuse duplicate posting.
The article below, from SPARC enews, reminded me of recent postings about Wikipedia, some of which questioned the viability of non-profit scholarly works. Possibly there are science/engineering librarians who are not aware of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a free online encyclopedia of the highest standards (and, by the way, it has useful entries on philosophy and history of science). The articles are signed, scholarly, and meet high editorial standards; many of them are by famous scholars. Instead of a "subscription model", libraries, institutions, and individuals have been asked to contribute toward an endowment fund which, it is anticipated, will keep the Encyclopedia functioning in the future. I look forward to the completion of SEP (and projected articles such as "chemistry, philosophy of").
Bob Michaelson Northwestern University Library Evanston, Illinois 60208 USA rmichael@northwestern.edu
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, with significant help from the worldwide library community, is nearing its goal of raising a $4,125,000 endowment, which would generate enough in appreciation and interest income to cover the SEP's expenses in perpetuity. To date, SEP has successfully secured $3,120,000 in funding commitments from a combination of sources:
Stanford has nearly reached its goal, raising $1,122,000, with some large donations from donors outside academia who have backgrounds in philosophy, as well as contributions from many professional philosophers. The libraries have also made substantial progress, collectively contributing $1,505,455 in pledges. Counting the $500,000 in NEH matching funds, the libraries have made commitments totaling $2,005,455.
The SEP still needs $1,000,000 in new commitments from the library community to reach its ultimate goal. Of the 120 libraries at institutions with Philosophy Ph.D. programs in the U.S. and Canada, 49 have committed the full amount requested ($15,000) to support the SEP and 18 have made a partial commitment. SEP is requesting help to preserve open access to a resource that is used at universities across the globe hundreds of thousands times each week.
SEPIA continues to collect membership dues from other libraries and library consortia worldwide. Learn more about SEPIA at http://www.libraries.iub.edu/index.php?pageId=3563. To register your commitment with SOLINET, go to http://www.solinet.net/survey/sep.htm. For a list of libraries already committed to the project, see http://plato.stanford.edu/fundraising/commitments.html.
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org