Hi! The Wikipedia Library has new, free research donations available:
NEW *DeGruyter: 1000 accounts for English and German-language research, sign up on one of two language Wikipedias: English signup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter German signup https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter *Fold3: 100 accounts for American history and military archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fold3 *Scotland's People: 100 accounts for Scottish Genealogy database https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ScotlandsPeople
EXPANDED *British Newspaper Archive: 100+ new accounts for British Newspapers archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BNA
OPEN *Highbeam: 100+ accounts for newspapers and magazines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:HighBeam *Questia: 100+ accounts for various aggregated journals and social science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Questia *JSTOR: 100+ accounts for journal archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:JSTOR
Accounts are available to ALL global editors with a 1 year old account and 1000 edits. Please notify your local community about the signups. Signups for now are mostly on English Wikipedia, UNLESS you have started a local Wikipedia Library branch like we've done on Arabic, Chinese, and German. To get started, please contact Ocaasi at [[m:User:Ocaasi (WMF)]] or ocaasi@wikimedia.org
Thanks!
The Wikipedia Library Team http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library
Hi!
This reminds me of ugly practices of proprietary software companies giving free software to students so that they are able to learn the tools and then later on have to pay. So we will be making links to paywalled journals and we will be able to do it for free, but then our readers will have to pay to read them? So Wikipedia will provide free advertisements for paywalled content? Nicely done, nicely done.
This is not open access. This direct opposite to open access. We should not be proud of this.
(Please don't take this as an attack on anybody personally and I think The Wikipedia Library Team is doing a great job, but I really feel this is a bad deal. And it was sent to the open access mailing list. Which this is not.)
Mitar
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Jake Orlowitz jorlowitz@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! The Wikipedia Library has new, free research donations available:
NEW *DeGruyter: 1000 accounts for English and German-language research, sign up on one of two language Wikipedias: English signup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter German signup https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter *Fold3: 100 accounts for American history and military archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fold3 *Scotland's People: 100 accounts for Scottish Genealogy database https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ScotlandsPeople
EXPANDED *British Newspaper Archive: 100+ new accounts for British Newspapers archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BNA
OPEN *Highbeam: 100+ accounts for newspapers and magazines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:HighBeam *Questia: 100+ accounts for various aggregated journals and social science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Questia *JSTOR: 100+ accounts for journal archives https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:JSTOR
Accounts are available to ALL global editors with a 1 year old account and 1000 edits. Please notify your local community about the signups. Signups for now are mostly on English Wikipedia, UNLESS you have started a local Wikipedia Library branch like we've done on Arabic, Chinese, and German. To get started, please contact Ocaasi at [[m:User:Ocaasi (WMF)]] or ocaasi@wikimedia.org
Thanks!
The Wikipedia Library Team http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library
OpenAccess mailing list OpenAccess@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
Forwarded as requested:
From: Raymond Leonard raymond.f.leonard.jr@gmail.com To: "Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public]" glam@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: Open Access discussions openaccess@lists.wikimedia.org, "Wikimedia & Libraries" Libraries@lists.wikimedia.org, wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, wikipedia-library@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:08:27 -0800 Subject: Re: [GLAM] [OpenAccess] New Wikipedia Library Signups: Free Research Accounts! Folks,
Even though I know most of cringe when we find a source that is behind a paywall, I think that we should treat it as marginally better than a offline source. For those, Wikipedia:Offline sources states "Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party, published sources. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources." (Source emphasis, not mine)
This is what I do for such citations.
I add "{{closed access}} " (including that space) before the citation template. I set the parameter |subscription=yes If there is an OCLC # available, I set the parameter |oclc= so that a reader can go find the print source in a library. If it is appropriate to include the parameter |issn= along with or instead of the |oclc= parameter, then I use that.
For some universities, colleges, & libraries, access to some online database will be free to their students / faculty / staff / patrons, so there definitely is a value to including to URL or DOI for those cases.
Yours, Peaceray -- User:Peaceray
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Mitar mmitar@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
This reminds me of ugly practices of proprietary software companies
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org