If we wish to improve the quality of academic articles than we need to increase Wikipedia's ties with academia. Poor coverage of topics exists in all fields.
We need to figure out why the academics we have now do contribute and why others do not. What do this group see as barriers to getting involved?
We need to liaison or partner more with Universities. Have Wikipedia used more in class projects. So much student work is just filled away to never be look at again after a term has ended. Wikipedia gives student a chance to make lasting changes to an academic field.
We need to look at why other wikis are being created such as wikidocs, medpeadia, and radiopedia (there are 87 dealing with science alone) rather than they joining us. Others in academia obviously perceive some problems with our system. Are this preceptions justified? Can we work with these other 87 wiki in a collaborative way to reduce a duplication of effort on similar content? Could we convince some of them to simply join us?
On 18 September 2010 18:28, James Heilman jmh649@gmail.com wrote:
We need to look at why other wikis are being created such as wikidocs, medpeadia, and radiopedia (there are 87 dealing with science alone) rather than they joining us. Others in academia obviously perceive some problems with our system. Are this preceptions justified? Can we work with these other 87 wiki in a collaborative way to reduce a duplication of effort on similar content? Could we convince some of them to simply join us?
The usual variation is looser rules on notability and original research. Failing all else, if the content is licence-compatible it's suitable to being ported to Wikipedia.
- d.
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org