Post under a nicer and more appropriate title

--------

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:

On 1/19/08, Gregory Maxwell

gmaxwell-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:

...

On Jan 19, 2008 12:25 AM, Mike Godwin

mnemonic-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:

...

...

I should think it apparent to pretty much everybody that the Kaltura collaboration is not convenient in the short term.

...

The choice of a partner which fundamentally requires proprietary technology, over alternative paths which use or create non-proprietary technology (which may currently be less mature or less adopted), is short term advantageous compared to other options.

Personally I think the situation is more nuanced than either of you

present

it as. The Wikimedia Foundation can be a influence for guiding towards what its mission is in many ways (and I regret our mission statement

still

does not make it explicit that we are for non-proprietary formats;

</ceterum

censeo> ).

Some routes are more frayed than others, though, and one needs must make an evaluation of what the best/most effective use of resources/good will/authority etc. is. Erik has clearly made one which you, Greg do not wholly agree with. That, I think, is fine. We should still respect

the fact

that evaluating that is what Erik is being paid for, and naturally Erik chooses whose opinion he relies upon, within the parameters set to him by the board (and here I remind the board, that it *does* have the

authority

to guide its employees _as a body_, though clearly not as individual

trustees).

Since you mention it, I wanted to clarify that we have drafted a file format policy. It has not yet been approved, some board member being willing to further discuss it with other individuals.

I think it relevant to copy this draft here. Comments welcome for all of you of course :-)

---------

Resolution:File format policy

Whereas an essential part of the Wikimedia Foundation's mission is encouraging the development of free-content educational resources that may be created, used, and reused by a diverse community, without restriction, and because we believe that this mission requires thriving open formats and open standards on the web to allow the creation of content not subject to restrictions on creation, use, and reuse, it is resolved that all material, text , multimedia, or software, on Wikimedia Foundation projects must be in a format that is: 1. Viewable or playable by existing free software tools 2. Able to be created or edited by existing free software tools. 3. Defined by an open standard, implementation, or specification not under proprietary control 4. Not itself subject to material patent-related restrictions on use that are incompatible with free software, nor only able to be authored or viewed by software so restricted. 5. Not encrypted or otherwise subject to technical protection measures incompatible with the permissions of free content licensing. where "free software" is software under any licensing terms that meet the Free Software Definition. Where an independently-used subset of the format meets these criteria, even if some files in that format do not (as with PDF and encrypted PDF), files in that subset qualify as acceptable formats under the text of this resolution.

Ant, your favorite sheep keeper