On 7/21/07, Joichi Ito <jito(a)neoteny.com> wrote: If it was the language in the public drafts during 2007 I am gravely mistaken and owe an apology. It *was* the language in a Dec 2006 draft I was given privately. Because I did not see the language in later drafts I believed it was dropped from consideration, I was in error to make that assumption regardless of anything else that went on. An example draft: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2007-February/005013.html Even if this isn't confusion on my part, then this still isn't the end of the world. There does appear to be a widespread belief that the current language is confusing, so I can't say that I'll be too happy if the end result is nothing more than to agree to disagree, but I am happy to see some progress. ;) Thanks for your attention. -- Greg