Hi, anyone knows if this MET initiative[1] is viable to have a reverberation in Commons, or if it is already a project in the community?
I see this is very similar to the British Library donation, on December 2013[2], that quickly started to spread on to Commons[3].
Any knowledge about this would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
María
[1] http://metmuseum.org/about-the-museum/press-room/news/2014/oasc-access [2] http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi... [3] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_the_British_Library_...
Hello,
Only their photographs of public domain two-dimensional works are compatible with Wikimedia Commons' upload policy, so that excludes most of what they are sharing.
The works that they are sharing which are compatible with Wikipedia are very impressive. I know of no one who is uploading them to Commons as a collection but I have taken their work as I liked it and shared it.
Despite what the museum director says in the press release, they are not providing images in accord with "open access" principles as they forbid reuse in commercial publications, like school textbooks.
The project is a big deal but still keeps major barriers between itself and the open educational resource movement.
yours,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Maria Cruz mcruz@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi, anyone knows if this MET initiative[1] is viable to have a reverberation in Commons, or if it is already a project in the community?
I see this is very similar to the British Library donation, on December 2013[2], that quickly started to spread on to Commons[3].
Any knowledge about this would be much appreciated!
Thanks,
María
[1] http://metmuseum.org/about-the-museum/press-room/news/2014/oasc-access [2]
http://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/12/a-million-fi... [3]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Images_from_the_British_Library_... _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
On 21 May 2014 21:25, Lane Rasberry lane@bluerasberry.com wrote:
Despite what the museum director says in the press release, they are not providing images in accord with "open access" principles as they forbid reuse in commercial publications, like school textbooks.
Well, arguably they are, barely. "Green open access" in scientific journals includes NC licenses. It's far short of being proper "free content", as you note.
- d.
On 21 May 2014 23:58, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2014 21:25, Lane Rasberry lane@bluerasberry.com wrote:
Despite what the museum director says in the press release, they are not providing images in accord with "open access" principles as they forbid reuse in commercial publications, like school textbooks.
Well, arguably they are, barely. "Green open access" in scientific journals includes NC licenses. It's far short of being proper "free content", as you note.
Indeed - Green OA is simply the right to make available for reading (and usually in fairly constrained circumstances). Direct reuse doesn't enter into it.
"Open access" is a very multifaceted term. :-)
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org