On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 8:33 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
In a message dated 11/7/2009 10:56:27 AM Pacific
Standard Time,
andreengels(a)gmail.com writes:
We tried that on nl: (although with 1 week rather
than 24 hours
minimum). The effect of this is that _each and every block_ will get
the whole wiki in flames for a week.>>
I would submit that this tells you something very significant.
The community likes freedom, and they don't like the suppression of
freedom.
No, it means that whoever you block there will always be *someone* who
is against it and makes an issue out of it that the block is unfair
etcetera. It does not mean that *the community* is of that opinion.
The police do not like freedom, and they do like to
suppress it.
When a group of police decide to gang up on a contributor, that contributor
has no "friend" on their side. You cannot appeal to the police to stop the
police.
You can appeal to other sysops, to the arbcom, to the community. What
you are proposing is to have *every* case be appealed to the community
automatically. There are always some people who are of the opinion
that if you have made personal attacks 30 times that is still 20 times
too few to be blocked.
That's my main point. However it has to be worked
out. We need a
contrasting force, that is dedicated to the freedom of the contributor.
No, we don't. We need forces to help the encyclopedia get further. We
don't need a force of people who stop people who are helping creating
it, and we don't need a force of people who support people who are not
helping creating it.
--
André Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com