On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net
--Mike
I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.
I'm not convinced you offered me a better choice of venue, geni. (If you did, I missed the email.) But, then, I'm also not convinced that worrying about venue -- rather than, say, focusing on publishing with a journal that would give me the space to develop an argument at some length.
I'm not well-positioned to game out the way every snarky commenter on the sidelines will interpret anything I write or where I manage to get published. But it's worth noting that the same journal asked me to make the case for Obama's re-election back in 2012, which is also something you wouldn't expect.
We may reasonably expect, given the choice of venue, that my argument will be considered quite heterodox to its regular readers, which is actually good, not bad. (Other pieces by other authors have decried net neutrality in general--I didn't do this, however, and they knew I wouldn't.)
--Mike
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net
--Mike
I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.
-- geni
People who are interested in the history of my views on network neutrality may find fodder here in this 2006 article I wrote on behalf of the American Library Association.
http://www.ala.org/offices/sites/ala.org.offices/files/content/oitp/publicat...
To the extent my views have evolved since them (and I'm inclined to say they haven't changed much), this is due partly to my years of work for Wikimedia Foundation and partly to my work on internet policy in the developing world.
See, for example, how I dealt with the issue in developing the Great Charter for Cambodian Internet Freedom.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/great-charter-cambodian-internet-freedom-mike....
--Mike
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net
--Mike
I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.
-- geni
This was an interesting read; I do hope I will one day get to speak to you at length on these topics.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
People who are interested in the history of my views on network neutrality may find fodder here in this 2006 article I wrote on behalf of the American Library Association.
http://www.ala.org/offices/sites/ala.org.offices/files/content/oitp/publicat...
To the extent my views have evolved since them (and I'm inclined to say they haven't changed much), this is due partly to my years of work for Wikimedia Foundation and partly to my work on internet policy in the developing world.
See, for example, how I dealt with the issue in developing the Great Charter for Cambodian Internet Freedom.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/great-charter-cambodian-internet-freedom-mike... .
--Mike
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin mnemonic@gmail.com wrote:
http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net
--Mike
I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue.
-- geni
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org