Meta deals with documentation for Wikimedia projects. It does not deal with the Community aspects of Wikimedia. The Community Assembly was just a title with a nice ring. Community is synonymous with mob. Assembly sounds like something of importance. ----- Original Message ---- From: Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 6:13:04 AM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Community Assembly Then why have it as a distinct group? You're talking about "The Wikimedia Community", so call it "The Wikimedia Community", there's no need for an assembly. Once you realise that, it also becomes clear that these "subgroups" are, in fact, just the naturally forming groups of people interested in a particular policy (or whatever) that discuss it on that policy page. You've just invented meta. It's a good idea, but it's so good it's already been done. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ