I note that it's currently impossible to find online mobile app usage statistics on the analytics we pages, dashboard or reportcard, where they last measured 0.0006% of pageviews in 2015:

I'm skeptical that the online mobile apps are a good use of resources, with their very meager usage, especially relative to the several engineers tasked to support them, their questionable accessibility aspects, declining app store ratings, and other issues involving content substitution which have recently come up on this list, not to mention breaking the cross-platform nature of the web. I note that it's currently impossible to find online mobile app usage statistics on the analytics we pages, dashboard or reportcard, where they last measured 0.0006% of pageviews in 2015: https://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportUserAgents.htm However, I wholeheartedly support this new offline app project, and hope that it will be the primary focus of the Foundation's app-not-web efforts going forward: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iESP20HGPiE https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Offline_support https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Offline_ support/V1_User_research Huge thanks to whomever directed this pivot! _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

You have data about app pageviews in several places, the most popular tool to see that kind of data has numbers, for example app pageviews for en.wikipedia. The notion of what is an app pageview fluctuates more than what is a web pageview, but numbers are quite far away from being less than 1% https://tools.wmflabs.org/siteviews/?platform=mobile-app&source=pagevie…

Yes, mobile app page views are much closer to 1.5% than 0.0006%, my mistake, I used the WAP row with 116,000 page views in 2015 instead of the 784,000,000 pageviews of the mobile app. I caught the error after pressing "Send", but I decided that it didn't need to be corrected, given that the Strategic Direction document still says, "in the next 15 years, the languages that will be the most spoken are primarily those that currently lack good content and strong Wikimedia communities," citing a table which predicts the most widely spoken languages in 2050, which in turn cites a report which says nothing about 2050, but does say, "Mandarin is the most spoken language globally." Mandarin is not the most widely spoken language: https://assets.weforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ 1510B15-languages-most-speakers-english-chinese-chart.png And it's growing much more slowly than English is: https://revolutioninlearning.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/ 14j3i4hyjvi88-0p0ofe-english-speakers-learners-1.jpg I would have corrected the error promptly if there was evidence that respect for the truth was more highly regarded. On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Legoktm &lt;legoktm.wikipedia(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: tool app&source=pageviews&agent=user&range=latest-20&sites=en.wi… wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>