He he... Quality is popular until someone points out errors on your own
articles! It is a quite difficult and controversial topic.
John
Den søn. 16. apr. 2017, 10.37 skrev Hajdu Kálmán <hmarcell(a)startadsl.hu>hu>:
Hi John,
In Hungary, on the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences of the Szent
István University (
http://gtk.sziu.hu/en) Pitlik László docents
(Pitlik.Laszlo(a)gtk.szie.hu) works on “robot-lectors”. The idea is very
similar with automated quality assurance. (
http://miau.gau.hu/miau2009/index.php3?x=e0&string=lektor
http://miau.gau.hu/miau2009/index.php3?x=e0&string=lector)tor).
You probably could contact him. But I should warn you he, as user Myx, he
is banned in german Wikipedia, and his articles deleted in Hungarian
Wikipedia.
Kalman
-- Eredeti üzenet --
*Feladó:* John Erling Blad <jeblad(a)gmail.com> <jeblad(a)gmail.com>
*Címzett: *Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>rg>,
Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
<wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
*Elküldve:* 2017. április 15. 23:50
*Tárgy : *[Wikimedia-l] Quality assurance of articles
Are anyone doing any work on automated quality assurance of articles? Not
the ORES-stuff, that is about creating hints from measured features. I'm
thinking about verifying existence and completeness of citations, and
structure of logical arguments.
John
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>