Jimmy
You seem anxious to deflect my question by making an unfounded accusation of distortion. The plain meaning of the posting I quoted was that Board members had no more time to devote to engagement with community members than they were currently allocating, and you clearly have read the entire thread that made it clear that that particular venue was faling at its avowed purpose of bringing Board and community together, apparently for the very reason of lack of time. That seems to me entirely relevant to the topic under discussion, in which you stated that "it is possible and welcomed to bring forward issues to board members at any time", which has not always been my experience in the past. Your knee-jerk antagonism does not help.
"Rogol"
On 11/13/16 5:57 PM, Rogol Domedonfors wrote:
Jimmy
You seem anxious to deflect my question by making an unfounded accusation of distortion.
I'm afraid you have misunderstood me. It is never appropriate to quote part of a conversation when the issue is broader.
The board welcomes engagement. That one particular mechanism isn't working is unfortunate, but not cause to cast aspersions.
--Jimbo
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org