2011/6/17 Joan Goma &lt;jrgoma(a)gmail.com&gt; Thanks, pairwise results will come (Mardetanha will hopefully publish them soon unless I mistunderstood him). I would like to apologize for the delays on our part, we understand that it is frustrating to be sitting on the edge of the seat without knowing when results arrive. Communication could definitely have been better. As I wrote in the board report, I think the elections would benefit from a semi-permanent committee, instead of an election-by-election-based committee. This would help counter repeats of the same mistakes, and smoothen things out. This year none of us were very technically-minded, and we learned that we definitely should have someone who can take care of that part as a committee member. In the beginning there were only three volunteers, but after some asking around we got two more (Matanya and Mardetanha), and there is a lot of work to do, so more volunteers is always nice. (Not trying to be apologetic here, there are many things we could have done better, and we should take self-criticism on that; I'm just trying to explain some of the factors involved.) Finally, congratulations to the winners! It is well-deserved. :-) Oh, and we will put up a post-mortem page on Meta soon, and all feedback is very welcome. -- mvh Jon Harald Søby <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jon_Harald_S%C3%B8by>