Hi Pine, I made that part of the deck and yes, you're interpreting it correctly. I put green checkmarks to indicate where something was (more-or-less) on track, where progress was about where it was supposed to be midway through the year. That's the basis on which the Visual Editor got a green check. I did consider using an orange marker of some kind, but there was no obvious symbol to indicate "on track" or "half done, as expected halfway through the year." So I just used a green check, to mark those activities as more-or-less fine. The point of those slides was really to emphasize where we are *not* on track, which is of course number-of-active-editors. We had hoped by this point that we would have arrested the slide and starting bringing the numbers up, but that has not happened. That's the message those slides are intended to convey. I would also say: that deck was used in a three-hour verbal presentation to the Board. Verbally, in person, we were able to convey more nuance and detail than is in the deck, and I would say the deck doesn't stand alone particularly well. We wanted to publish it anyway, because there is quite a bit of useful information in it. But it's not designed so much as a standalone report: it was really used as the backdrop for a presentation, in order to kick off a conversation about next year's plan. Thanks, Sue On Mar 3, 2012 10:09 PM, "En Pine" <deyntestiss(a)hotmail.com> wrote: