In reference to people wanting to be nicer to newbies, (and next to the obvious step of us really needing to make it more frelling obvious that YES YOU CAN EDIT)
... that doesn't help much if the entire community has come down with adminitis and kicks anyone who tries to edit out of the wiki and up into low earth orbit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adminitis
So qua editor retention, 2 things are needed: * Make editing more obvious and easy, and bring the fun back. :-) * Work on The Cure For Adminitis (tm). O:-)
sincerely, Kim Bruning
On the bright side, this does reduce the cost of space exploration with cheaper access to low earth orbit. :)
The problem is adminship became something like knighthood even though it is barely significant. Perhaps more admin tools should be available to those "worthy" such as how rollback became no big deal.
Also maybe calling them "administrators" is a problem. Original SysOp sounds less authoritarian. I know administrator also means Janitor in English but I noticed the problem when newbies, particularly non-native speakers perceive the status.
Another point I like to make is how BJODAN was removed. Indeed it was a problem and its removal was more or less a blessing but the wiki became too serious business (intentional LOLCAT reference).
These are just a few ideas to consider...
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 21:52, Kim Bruning kim@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
In reference to people wanting to be nicer to newbies, (and next to the obvious step of us really needing to make it more frelling obvious that YES YOU CAN EDIT)
... that doesn't help much if the entire community has come down with adminitis and kicks anyone who tries to edit out of the wiki and up into low earth orbit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adminitis
So qua editor retention, 2 things are needed:
- Make editing more obvious and easy, and bring the fun back. :-)
- Work on The Cure For Adminitis (tm). O:-)
sincerely, Kim Bruning
--
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
I don't, and if you disagree, you are trolling and I'll block you!
Lodewijk
No dia 2 de Novembro de 2011 21:52, Kim Bruning kim@bruning.xs4all.nlescreveu:
In reference to people wanting to be nicer to newbies, (and next to the obvious step of us really needing to make it more frelling obvious that YES YOU CAN EDIT)
... that doesn't help much if the entire community has come down with adminitis and kicks anyone who tries to edit out of the wiki and up into low earth orbit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adminitis
So qua editor retention, 2 things are needed:
- Make editing more obvious and easy, and bring the fun back. :-)
- Work on The Cure For Adminitis (tm). O:-)
sincerely, Kim Bruning
--
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Kim Bruning, 02/11/2011 21:52:
So qua editor retention, 2 things are needed:
- Make editing more obvious and easy, and bring the fun back. :-)
- Work on The Cure For Adminitis (tm). O:-)
The only known cure is abstention: either wikibreak or editing on a wiki where you're not sysop or on the same wiki but as IP or with a sockpuppet. But we could try some saturnalia where e.g. rollbackers are given all sysops rights, sysops lose all sysop rights and arbitrators lose even rights given to autoconfirmed users. :-D
Nemo
Does anyone feel that the Wikiquette is too weak to enforce the respect aspect of the five pillars?
I wonder if we should make RFC/U a lot easier for cases where administrators show a pattern of not handling new editors very well. If [[WP:WQA]] had some teeth, say 3 reports against an admin and you have to go back to "admin school" (not necessarily the pillory of RFA) this might be a way of making some overly bullish admins think twice about their language and impression they give newbies.
Cheers, Fae
Hoi, Apparently I do not suffer because as an admin I should know what RFC/U or WP:WQA or RFA is. Or is it only when I meet people who know their acronyms that I suffer ? Thanks, GerardM
On 7 November 2011 13:48, Fae fae@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Does anyone feel that the Wikiquette is too weak to enforce the respect aspect of the five pillars?
I wonder if we should make RFC/U a lot easier for cases where administrators show a pattern of not handling new editors very well. If [[WP:WQA]] had some teeth, say 3 reports against an admin and you have to go back to "admin school" (not necessarily the pillory of RFA) this might be a way of making some overly bullish admins think twice about their language and impression they give newbies.
Cheers, Fae
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org