This struck me as unnecessarily confrontational.
The stream of abuse from those who consider themselves the guardians of Meta strikes me as unnecessarily confrontational, and I'm really not happy about it. When one of those is a Foundation board member, I'm even less happy about it.
- d.
This struck me as unnecessarily confrontational.
The stream of abuse from those who consider themselves the guardians of Meta strikes me as unnecessarily confrontational, and I'm really not happy about it. When one of those is a Foundation board member, I'm even less happy about it.
- d.
David, I have failed to see any abuse from people questioning this project on Meta, which I have myself been materially supportive of.
This is not usenet. In Wikimedia we apologize when we have been in error and move on.
Amgine
David Gerard wrote:
This struck me as unnecessarily confrontational.
The stream of abuse from those who consider themselves the guardians of Meta strikes me as unnecessarily confrontational, and I'm really not happy about it. When one of those is a Foundation board member, I'm even less happy about it.
Can you stop breaking the subject lines? I've asked you this many times. If your email client doesn't support it, please upgrade to one which does, such as Thunderbird. It is really inconvenient for the rest of us.
Thanks, Chris
On 3/31/06, Chris Jenkinson chris@starglade.org wrote:
Can you stop breaking the subject lines? I've asked you this many times. If your email client doesn't support it, please upgrade to one which does, such as Thunderbird. It is really inconvenient for the rest of us.
Changing the subject line is quite appropriate if one feels the topic has veered off the original one.
If you're meaning something else, then "breaking the subject lines" isn't a good description of it ...
-Matt
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org