In a message dated 6/27/2010 12:45:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, thomas.dalton@gmail.com writes:
On 27 June 2010 20:42, William Pietri william@scissor.com wrote:
Given that this is recurring drama-creating behavior, perhaps we can move on to the "ignore" stage of WP:RBI.
On enwiki, we did that ages ago. I don't believe he is blocked on Wikiversity (yet). >> --------------
Challenging the use of the word "ages" above. _http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag...: Ottava+Rima_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag...)
To me ages implies a term longer than six months. An interesting and verbose block log. Unsolicited and probably unwanted advice, possibly from a person who has a similar personality -- I have learned to never, ever, ever look at my Watchlist.
I make my changes, and move on, and never look back. Thus, I never weep over the massacre made on my beautiful workmanship. Weeping does not turn into gnashing of teeth, and does not proceed into daggers of vengeance, then to the remorse caused by unwanted punishment.
Interesting that a recent mod (prior to banning) was to Ada Lovelace. I *just yesterday*, believe it or don't, posted an update on Ada's pre-modern ancestry to the gen-med list. / soc.gen.med group.
Odd co-incidence. Makes me wonder what cosmic significance I'm supposed to draw here.
Will "Co-incidentally connected" Johnson
On 06/28/2010 01:00 AM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I make my changes, and move on, and never look back. Thus, I never weep over the massacre made on my beautiful workmanship. Weeping does not turn into gnashing of teeth, and does not proceed into daggers of vengeance, then to the remorse caused by unwanted punishment.
I believe there was some research which claimed that quality of articles tended to decrease dramatically if they were not watched by their main authors.
--vvv
wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org